14.02.2021 Views

Tahafut_al-Tahafut-transl-Engl-van-den-Bergh

a book on philosophy

a book on philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

I say:

black and white, fourness and threeness, and all other

accidents that they exist by themselves. ‘

The error and confusion in his statement is very evident, for it has been

proved that there is among attributes one that has a greater claim to the

term `substantiality’ than the substance existing by itself, and this is the

attribute through which the substance existing by itself becomes existing

by itself. For it has been proved that the substratum for this attribute is

something neither existing by itself nor existing in actuality; no, its existing

by itself and its actual existence derive from this attribute, and this

attribute in its existence is like that which receives the accidents, although

certain of these attributes, as is evident from their nature, need a

substratum in the changeable things, since it is the fundamental law of the

accidents, that they exist in something else, whereas the fundamental law

of the quiddities is that they exist by themselves, except when, in the

sublunary world, these quiddities need a substratum through being in

transitory i things. But this attribute is at the greatest distance from the

nature of an accident, and to compare this transcendent knowledge to

sublunary accidents is extremely foolish, indeed more foolish than to

consider the soul an accident like threeness and fourness.

And this suffices to show the incoherence and the foolishness of this

whole argument, and let us rather call this book simply `The Incoherence’,

not `The Incoherence of the Philosophers’. And what is further from the

nature of an accident than the nature of knowledge, and especially the

knowledge of the First? And since it is at the greatest distance from the

nature of an accident, it is at the greatest distance from having a necessity

for a substratum.

THE SEVENTH DISCUSSION

TO REFUTE THEIR CLAIM THAT NOTHING CAN SHARE

WITH THE FIRST ITS GENUS, AND BE DIFERENTIATED

FROM IT THROUGH A SPECK DIFERENCE, AND THAT

WITH RESPECT TO ITS INTELLECT THE DIVISION INTO

295

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!