14.02.2021 Views

Tahafut_al-Tahafut-transl-Engl-van-den-Bergh

a book on philosophy

a book on philosophy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

It may be said that if it is asserted that the First knows its

own self as a principle by way of relation, the knowledge of

two correlatives is one and the same, for the man who

knows the son knows him through one single knowledge in

which the knowledge of the father, of fatherhood, and

sonhood are comprised, so that the objects of knowledge

are manifold, but the knowledge is one. ‘ And in the same

way the First knows its essence as a principle for the other

things besides itself and so the knowledge is one, although

what is known is manifold. Further, if the First thinks this

relation in reference to one single effect and its own relation

towards it, and this does not imply a plurality, then a plurality

is not implied by an addition of things which generically do

not imply a plurality. ‘ And likewise he who knows a thing

and knows his knowing this thing, knows this thing through

this knowledge, and therefore all knowledge is selfknowledge

connected with the knowledge of the thing

known, ‘ and the known is manifold, but knowledge forms a

unity. ; An indication of this is also that you theologians

believe that the things known to God are infinite, but His

knowledge is one, and you do not attribute to God an infinite

number of cognitions; if, indeed, the manifoldness of the

known implied a plurality in the knowledge itself, well, let

there then be an infinite number of cognitions in the essence

of God. But this is absurd.

Then Ghazali says, answering the philosophers:

We say: Whenever knowledge is one in every respect, it

cannot be imagined that it should be attached to two things

known; on the contrary, this determines a certain plurality,

according to the assumption and tenet of the philosophers

themselves about the meaning of ‘plurality’, so that they

even make the excessive claim that if the First had a quiddity

to which existence were attributed, this would imply a

plurality. And they do not think that to a single unity

possessing reality existence also can be attributed; no, they

assert that the existence is brought in relation to the reality

281

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!