22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

discrimination. In spring 1933, the Swiss Federal authorities passed a law,<br />

which was to remain in force until 1944, distinguishing between political and<br />

other refugees. Political refugees were those who were under personal threat<br />

owing to their political activities. The Federal authorities were extremely<br />

reticent to recognise political refugees; communists in particular were not<br />

welcome. According to an instruction issued by the Federal Department of<br />

Justice and Police (Eidgenössisches Justiz- und Polizeidepartement, EJPD) only<br />

«high state officials, leaders of left-wing parties and well-known authors»<br />

should be accepted as political refugees. On the basis of this restrictive interpretation<br />

of the term «refugee», Switzerland granted political asylum to only<br />

644 people between 1933 and 1945, of these, 252 cases were admitted during<br />

the war. The Federal Council had the final decision on granting political<br />

asylum; political refugees were the responsibility of the Federal Prosecutor’s<br />

Office (Bundesanwaltschaft), which was part of the EJPD. 4<br />

All other refugees were considered simply as foreigners from a legal point of<br />

view and were subject to the stipulations of the Federal Law on Residence and<br />

Settlement of Foreigners of 26 March 1931, which came into force in 1934.<br />

From an administrative point of view, they were the responsibility of the<br />

cantonal police, which issued so-called tolerance permits (valid for a few months<br />

only), residence permits and settlement permits. The Police Division of the<br />

EJPD co-ordinated cantonal policy regarding foreigners; as the highest<br />

authority, the Police Division had to approve the issuing of work permits and<br />

longer-term residence permits in particular. In addition the Division could<br />

lodge an objection to cantonal decisions. Between 1933 and 1938, however, the<br />

cantons still enjoyed a good deal of freedom in the way they implemented their<br />

policy with regard to refugees. Some cantons adopted a very restrictive policy<br />

while others freely issued tolerance permits. The latter were granted on the<br />

condition that the recipient did not engage in gainful employment and left<br />

Switzerland as soon as possible. 5 Switzerland saw itself as a transit state, a<br />

halfway station for refugees where they would organise their emigration to other<br />

countries such as France, the Netherlands or the USA. In view of the restrictive<br />

policy adopted by Switzerland after the end of the First World War, it was<br />

hardly worth considering as a place of permanent residence. In his manual for<br />

emigrants published in 1935, the Jewish sociologist Mark Wischnitzer wrote<br />

«The ban on employing foreigners is implemented to the letter in Switzerland».<br />

He also mentioned the authorities’ fight against «over-foreignisation»<br />

(«Überfremdung»), which had negative repercussions in particular for Jewish<br />

emigrants. 6 Accordingly, at the end of 1937 there were only around 5,000<br />

refugees in Switzerland. 7<br />

107

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!