22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of the assets purchased from Speyer, also founding the Custodian Trust<br />

Company in Charlottetown. 25 Credit Suisse’s hesitation in buying a Jewish bank<br />

may have been due to an ingrained anti-Semitism, but was no doubt chiefly<br />

motivated by the fear that purchasing such a firm might have had a negative<br />

effect on its relations with German firms and the German authorities. One<br />

participant in the discussions held in December 1938 remarked that the takeover<br />

of a Jewish bank would damage «our relations with Germany and Italy».<br />

The USA became increasingly important for investment by banks. Of Credit<br />

Suisse’s total assets held abroad in 1940, 208.5 million francs or 66% were in<br />

the United States, while the corresponding figure for the Swiss Bank Corporation<br />

was 348.2 million francs (55%), and for the Union Bank of Switzerland,<br />

61.6 million francs (54%). In comparison, assets held in Germany, which in<br />

view of the radical foreign exchange restrictions was becoming an increasingly<br />

problematic area for investment, comprised only 2%, 6% and 4% respectively. 26<br />

Thus by transferring funds to the USA, the Swiss banks were acting in the<br />

interests of a broad range of customers who first and foremost sought financial,<br />

but also political security. They included both Nazi victims and party members,<br />

as well as tax evaders and people who wanted to get their capital out of Germany.<br />

During the war, the banks did not reveal the identity of such customers to the<br />

US authorities.<br />

There is no doubt that connections with Germany played a role in the expansion<br />

of the dealings of the major banks with the USA. In January 1941, the<br />

Reichsbank asked the Union Bank of Switzerland whether it wanted to take<br />

over the dollar transactions for which it used middlemen. In its answer, the UBS<br />

remained true to its strategy of outsourcing questionable transactions and<br />

suggested using a third company, Lombardbank AG in Zurich, whose staff had<br />

been «Aryanised» with a view to such dealings. Although UBS offered the<br />

mandate at a highly attractive commission of only 0.5‰ 27 Reichsbank finally<br />

rejected the offer and instead expanded its relations with the Swiss Bank Corporation.<br />

In March 1941, the Zurich branch of the Swiss Bank Corporation<br />

became the Reichsbank’s official clearing office for its dollar transactions in<br />

Switzerland. In its transactions in the USA, the Swiss Bank Corporation had to<br />

conceal the involvement of the Reichsbank; it made a transfer of 294,000 dollars<br />

from several accounts at the Chase National Bank in New York to a Mexican<br />

bank in favour of the Banco Germánico de la América del Sur, a subsidiary of<br />

Dresden Bank. In June 1941, the Reichsbank’s account with the Swiss Bank<br />

Corporation showed a balance of 721,565 dollars (= 3,102,729 francs). In<br />

summer 1944, the Swiss Bank Corporation estimated that it managed assets in<br />

the USA to the value of 821,000 dollars for Germans and German companies,<br />

and a further 120,000 dollars for non-German companies that were controlled<br />

271

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!