22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

were much more diverse: before 1940, 80% of the volume was consumer goods<br />

(agricultural products, especially corn and rice, as well as silk, cotton, rope,<br />

shoes, vehicles, and machinery, plus a few mineral products and colonial goods<br />

from the Middle East). From the time when Italy entered the war in June 1940<br />

to the summer of 1943, these consumer goods were joined by a considerable<br />

amount of chemical products, especially sulphur and mercury (Italy was the<br />

main supplier of these products to its alliance partner), and later metals<br />

(especially pig iron). The proportion of goods important to the war effort subsequently<br />

rose to about 36%.<br />

With the fall of Mussolini, the landing of the Western powers in southern Italy,<br />

and the occupation of central and northern Italy by German troops, there was a<br />

fundamental change in conditions, since the Germans now dominated on both<br />

sides of the Alpine crossings. Despite attempts to camouflage it, the traffic lost<br />

its commercial appearance and now consisted largely of confiscated or<br />

plundered goods. With total disregard for international law, all available<br />

reserves of raw materials were transported to Germany. Italian factories were<br />

dismantled and their machinery and tools were removed and put to work for the<br />

German war effort. The plundering even extended to some of the already scarce<br />

food supplies.<br />

The single-track Brenner rail-line was overloaded because of the troops and coal<br />

deliveries coming from the north, and was insufficient to carry the plundered<br />

goods in the opposite direction so that the transport options through<br />

Switzerland also had to be used. Between autumn 1943 and autumn 1944, these<br />

consignments made up approximately half of all goods moving northwards<br />

through Switzerland. The proportion would have been even higher if the<br />

authorities had not reacted across a broad spectrum (from the EPD to the<br />

Federal Customs Administration) in October 1943, when these movements<br />

began. The consignments were designated as contrary to international law, and<br />

allowing them to be shipped through Switzerland was seen as placing a great<br />

strain on relations with the Allies. Obviously, it proved difficult to distinguish<br />

between authorised and unauthorised consignments at the border control<br />

points. Still, a complete transit prohibition would, in the view of the authorities<br />

at the time, have gone against national interests just as much as an<br />

unlimited licence to transport goods would have. In November 1943, a<br />

somewhat arbitrary criterion was introduced, but one which could be implemented<br />

easily and without delay: all goods which had already been used were<br />

sent back, but new goods were allowed through. As Pierre Bonna wrote to the<br />

customs authorities, it would hardly be possible to arrive at any other solution<br />

without bringing «normal traffic» to a standstill. 8 This solution could not of<br />

course be applied to consignments of raw materials: in this case, care was taken<br />

231

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!