22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6 Issues of Property Rights in the Post-War Period<br />

It was first and foremost the outstanding property rights issues which, by raising<br />

the subject of «dormant accounts», rekindled the debate in 1996 about<br />

Switzerland’s role during the Second World War. As an international centre for<br />

asset management, Switzerland had also, since the First World War, been<br />

attracting the savings of people who would subsequently become victims of the<br />

Nazi regime. At the same time, this financial centre also served a wide variety of<br />

German interests. The previous chapter presented some legal aspects of the issues<br />

involved and highlighted the tensions arising from the unswerving continuity of<br />

(international) private law while far-reaching changes were taking place in Swiss<br />

public law. This chapter addresses the post-war period. At the centre are the<br />

questions of the way Swiss banks and insurance companies dealt with the<br />

property entrusted to them by private individuals and how they interpreted these<br />

property rights. What was the attitude of other players in the financial market<br />

towards claims for reparations and restitution after 1945 and what measures did<br />

the authorities decide to take? How did authority, law, and the economy interact<br />

as regards «Wiedergutmachung» for the victims of Nazi persecution?<br />

6.1 Reparations, Restitution, «Wiedergutmachung»:<br />

Concepts and Premises<br />

Efforts to return looted property and to make individual restitution can be<br />

traced back to the wartime period. 1 Already in 1939, shortly after war broke<br />

out, plans to this effect were made by Jews in Britain and Palestine. Until this<br />

time, the demand for compensation was confined to «small circles», although<br />

voices raised with reference to the problem of individual compensation<br />

payments were not entirely absent. 2 In 1944 the World Jewish Congress (WJC)<br />

published a study by Nehemiah Robinson, who addressed this topic and, among<br />

other things, estimated Jewish property in the countries and territories<br />

occupied by the Third Reich to be worth 6–8.6 billion dollars. 3 In the same<br />

year, an interdepartmental committee established by the US government (the<br />

Interdivisional Committee on Reparations, Restitution and Property Rights)<br />

published its final report. 4 As far as individual restitution rights were<br />

423

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!