22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

had the impression that they were dealing with a trustworthy partner. Many<br />

Swiss bankers tended to view the new regime in a positive light all in all. Like<br />

a large section of the German financial sector, they felt that the fact that the<br />

danger of a socialist form of National Socialism seemed to have been eliminated<br />

was especially important and that there was little likelihood of the German<br />

banks being destroyed or nationalised. The impression also prevailed that the<br />

authorities responsible for economic policy (in particular the Reichsbank) were<br />

successful in their efforts, evidently based on economic reasons, to repress anti-<br />

Semitic outbreaks. Nazi Germany was therefore considered a respectable<br />

negotiating partner by Swiss bankers. After returning from a trip to Berlin in<br />

April 1933 (shortly after the «boycott» of Jewish businesses on 1 April that year<br />

which was stopped by an official order), Rudolf Bindschedler, Managing<br />

Director of Credit Suisse, for example, reported to his colleagues that the basic<br />

tenets of Hitler’s government were anchored in the Christian faith, family<br />

values, and respect for private property. Its merit lay in the fact that<br />

«communism has been put down once and for all, which means that Europe has<br />

perhaps been saved from Bolshevism and Western culture will remain intact.»<br />

At that time, «the Jewish question, in which there had been an easing of<br />

tension», seemed «to have been settled for the time being». 16 Although it was<br />

believed that there was political «detente», the economic prospects did not look<br />

any brighter. During these months German firms which were dependent on the<br />

state in one way or another, either because they relied on public contracts or<br />

needed public funding for reorganisation, were put under pressure to remove all<br />

Jews from senior management positions. In view of the «politicisation of the<br />

economy», the directors of Credit Suisse were no longer entirely confident about<br />

the future prospects of Jewish companies. They tended more to concern<br />

themselves with loans already granted to such firms, in particular with some of<br />

the department-stores which were being badly harassed by the Nazis, such as<br />

Leonhard Tietz AG and Rudolph Karstadt AG.<br />

Banking operations with Nazi Germany until the end of the war<br />

After the outbreak of the Second World War in September 1939, the British<br />

and American banks cancelled their participation in the German credit<br />

agreement. The Swiss banks, for their part, signed a further agreement with<br />

Germany on 18 September 1939 which formed an irrevocable basis for<br />

maintaining their mutual relationship and for this reason was also welcomed<br />

by the Germans. From 1942 on, the representatives of the Swiss banks<br />

demanded higher repayments and the cancellation of unused credit lines, no<br />

doubt as a reaction to the change in the military situation which appeared to<br />

strengthen their negotiating position. In order to maintain their special<br />

265

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!