22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

was merely the first phase leading to the complete break-up of the German<br />

Jewish collections. In 1938, a second phase began in which the German authorities<br />

and party units systematically confiscated and resold Jewish art collections<br />

– or what was left of them. In 1939, the «Führermuseum» was founded in Linz.<br />

With the attack on France, Belgium and the Netherlands in summer 1940,<br />

other notorious art looting organisations were established, such as the «ERR»<br />

Task Force (Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg) set up by Operations Headquarters<br />

Reichsleiter Alfred Rosenberg and the Künsberg Special Commando Unit<br />

(Sonderkommando Künsberg), which was answerable to the Foreign Office. These<br />

looting teams were closely linked, both causally and chronologically, with<br />

Germany’s policy of expansion; they therefore operated mainly in the occupied<br />

countries.<br />

For the «expropriation phase» on the whole, no evidence was found of direct<br />

links between German Reich authorities/museums and Swiss authorities or<br />

other public institutions. However, until the outbreak of war in 1939, Swiss<br />

museums, collectors and dealers acquired Jewish-owned works of art, in some<br />

cases directly from «Jew auctions» («Judenauktionen»). For example, the art<br />

dealer and gallery-owner Theodor Fischer purchased a number of porcelain<br />

artefacts from the Emma Budge collection. Otto Fischer, the director of the<br />

Basler Kunstmuseum, also bought graphic works locally between 1933 and<br />

1937, either through direct purchase arrangements or via middlemen.<br />

Trade probably expanded during the years when transactions intensified as a<br />

result of persecution; the same applies to non-professional opportunist dealing,<br />

which is difficult to investigate and quantify. Contrary to expectations, in the<br />

category of high-quality and therefore well-documented cultural assets, far<br />

more cases involving flight assets than looted assets were noted.<br />

The trade in flight assets<br />

It also happened that legal owners, as a result of persecution by the National<br />

Socialists, brought collections to Switzerland themselves. The transfer of flight<br />

assets took place on a substantial scale, especially during the early 1930s. These<br />

flight assets, mainly owned by wealthy and cultured people among the Jews,<br />

found their way to countries all over Europe and also overseas. The «looting<br />

taxes» levied on emigration and the foreign exchange transfer regulations were<br />

tightened up only gradually, and initially the obstacles to exporting assets were<br />

even less of a hurdle. Some Jewish collectors decided to emigrate to Switzerland<br />

primarily because of the contacts they had established with Swiss museums or<br />

collectors prior to 1933. Swiss museums were in a position to offer collectors a<br />

very attractive opportunity to transfer their assets, as they were able to arrange<br />

the import of artworks from the Reich with «free passage» into Switzerland<br />

356

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!