22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The interests of the railway companies<br />

The task of the railway companies was to operate the Swiss rail network at a<br />

technical and commercial level, and to ensure both internal and transit traffic.<br />

Thus, not only the rails themselves, but also staff, electricity, rolling stock and<br />

locomotives were made available for transit use, since the Italian locomotives<br />

used a different electrical system and the German access lines had not yet been<br />

electrified. The majority of orders went to the SBB, operator of the Gotthard line,<br />

with a smaller proportion going to the Lötschberg-Simplon line, which was run<br />

by the private competitor company BLS, albeit subsidised by the canton of Bern.<br />

Both companies had gone through hard times in the crisis of the 1930s, and had<br />

accumulated deficits which had to be covered by the state. There was a general<br />

decline in the use of transport capacity, and a corresponding increase in competition<br />

from the non-Swiss Alpine crossings (Mont-Cenis in France; the Brenner<br />

and Tarvisio route in Austria). The war brought about major changes: there was<br />

a sharp reversal in the previous decline in passenger traffic. Whereas the SBB had<br />

carried only 166 million passengers in 1938, the figure rose to 279 million by<br />

1944. In the same period, the volume of goods rose from 20.85 million to 33.47<br />

million tons. Starting 1939, company accounts were back in the black. Transit<br />

played its part in these pleasing results and, although its contribution was not<br />

large, it was also not to be ignored. Before the war, transit accounted for 6%; in<br />

1940 it rose to 13.5%, and in 1941 it peaked at 16%; the figure for 1942 was<br />

15%, with 10% in 1943 and just 7.5% in 1944. The fact that profits remained<br />

contained is explained by the commitment to the principle of preferential rates<br />

set out in the Gotthard Agreement of 1907. These averaged only about half of<br />

domestic rates and were, in turn, kept stable by the government up until 1944<br />

in order to combat inflation.<br />

Throughout the war, the two railway companies, within their limited<br />

autonomy, pursued a decidedly aggressive profit policy based on the concept of<br />

international competitiveness. For one thing, the Swiss railway companies<br />

(despite state guarantees) worked as profit-oriented businesses and for that<br />

reason alone had an interest in providing services to the Axis powers. Secondly,<br />

the mere fact that these were companies (and this was even more clearly seen<br />

with the power stations) with all their operating costs and investments to be<br />

written off, meant that there was a certain pressure to exploit their full capacity<br />

for economic reasons. The aim, which had the agreement of the fundamentally<br />

anti-fascist railway workers’ union, was to ship the greatest possible transit<br />

volumes on technically and commercially favourable terms on Switzerland’s<br />

own lines, and to ensure a strong market position for the future. After the<br />

turning point of the war in 1943, the companies became aware that «policy»<br />

decisions were now inevitable. Added to this was the fact that their customers<br />

233

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!