22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

esumption of debt service and were pursued with great determination on both<br />

sides. Germany was able to put pressure on Switzerland and other creditors<br />

using as leverage the debts owed to them. It was at this time that John Maynard<br />

Keynes made his famous remark about the power of the debtor. According to<br />

Keynes, a person owing the bank £ 100 has a problem. If, however, that same<br />

person owes the bank £ 100,000, it is the bank which has a problem. Under the<br />

circumstances prevailing at the time, Switzerland was a banker with an<br />

enormous problem. The question arose as to the extent to which Switzerland<br />

was willing or in a position to withstand pressure from Germany. Since there<br />

was considerable interest on both sides in maintaining functional financial<br />

relations, Germany indicated that it was ready to negotiate and was also<br />

prepared to make concessions. The discussions on the resumption of debt service<br />

led to the conclusion of a first «special agreement» between the two countries<br />

in October 1933. This agreement was updated each year and guaranteed the<br />

transfer of a large part of the outstanding interest due to the Swiss banks. This<br />

solution satisfied the requirements of the banks, which were far more interested<br />

in regular interest payments than the availability of capital stock. After<br />

Germany extended the ban on transferring funds abroad on 14 June 1934, longterm<br />

capital interest was included in the first Germano-Swiss Clearing<br />

Agreement. An unequivocal consequence of German pressure and Swiss<br />

diplomacy in 1933/34 was the fact that Germany was in a position to breach<br />

the solid front of international creditor banks, a manoeuvre that suited the<br />

wishes of the major Swiss banks too.<br />

In the 1930s, negotiations on frozen capital demands remained a central issue<br />

of financial diplomacy. Up until February 1938, total German debts abroad<br />

were continually reduced through gradual repayments, redemption on<br />

secondary markets (see below), and partly also as a result of the devaluation of<br />

all creditors’ currencies (pound sterling in September 1931, the dollar in April<br />

1933, and the franc in September 1936). Germany’s total debts to Switzerland<br />

fell from 3.1 billion reichsmarks to 1.3 billion reichsmarks (a drop of 58%)<br />

between July 1931 and February 1938, while debts to the USA decreased by an<br />

even greater rate of 69% and those to Great Britain by 53% over the same<br />

period. 15<br />

Under the given conditions, the Swiss bankers achieved their aims in the<br />

negotiations. But how did they perceive their negotiating partners, i.e., the<br />

Nazi regime? The National Socialist movement had never made a secret of its<br />

animosity towards international financial capital so that a stricter attitude on<br />

the question of debt retirements was to be expected, and manifested itself in the<br />

negotiations held in 1933 and 1934, as well as in the partial moratoria. On the<br />

other hand, the government appeared to have become more stable and bankers<br />

264

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!