22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Nations Monetary and Financial Conference at Bretton Woods (July 1944)<br />

stated that<br />

«enemy leaders, enemy nationals and their collaborators are transferring<br />

assets to and through neutral countries in order to conceal them and to<br />

perpetuate their influence, power, and ability to plan future aggrandisement<br />

and world domination». 32<br />

The Swiss Bankers Association – SBA (<strong>Schweiz</strong>erische Bankiervereinigung, SBVg)<br />

did not react to this criticism until two months after the Bretton Woods<br />

Conference. In September, they agreed to send two circular letters to their<br />

members indicating in detail how Switzerland could avoid being used as a safe<br />

haven for flight capital and the spoils of war. The SBA declined to pass on the<br />

Allies’ warning from July directly to the banks, however. A committee of the<br />

Bank’s Board of Directors decided that «the warning will not be passed on to<br />

the banks and our answer to the Allies will be that the banks know nothing<br />

about the matter.» 33 An official announcement made by diplomat Walter Stucki<br />

on 9 February 1945 stating that an investigation would be carried out into the<br />

extent of foreign accounts, was badly received by the Swiss banks. Stucki said<br />

that Switzerland had become the most hated country in the whole world and<br />

was regarded as the «last refuge of plutocracy». On 12 February 1945, the Swiss<br />

Bankers Association stated that «the decision that has been taken severely<br />

curtails the freedom of action of the Swiss Bankers Association and creates a<br />

precedent to which the only reaction can be one of profound astonishment and<br />

serious concern.» 34 Despite these protests, the Federal Council decided in its<br />

Decree of 16 February 1945 to freeze German accounts in Switzerland.<br />

Omnibus accounts constituted an important tool for managing foreign capital<br />

that could serve as a vehicle for exporting flight capital for both the Nazis and<br />

those persecuted by them. As a result of the problems mentioned above<br />

concerning certification, there was a delay in releasing Swiss assets in the USA<br />

compared to those of other countries. The question was finally resolved as a<br />

secondary matter at the negotiations preceding the Washington Agreement in<br />

May 1946. The regulation of the certification procedure was not settled until<br />

the end of the year, however, so that Swiss assets began to be released only in<br />

February 1947. It was a complicated and lengthy process lasting until 1952. In<br />

order to have assets certified, customers had to provide the banks with a declaration<br />

of ownership; after a careful check, the banks informed the US authorities<br />

via the Swiss Clearing Office (<strong>Schweiz</strong>erische Verrechnungsstelle, SVSt) that the<br />

assets in question fulfilled the requirements for release. In its final report on the<br />

release of Swiss assets in the USA, the Clearing Office noted that the misuse of<br />

273

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!