22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

discourage refugee smugglers and thus to reduce the stream of refugees «to an<br />

acceptable number». Entry into Switzerland would continue to be allowed,<br />

however, at those crossing points where there was no additional surveillance.<br />

The contradictory character of this document illustrates the alarm and<br />

confusion of a senior official who asked his superior to «give him an<br />

appointment tomorrow evening or Saturday morning to discuss the matter». 26<br />

We do not know whether the two men did meet to discuss the problem and, if<br />

they did, what Federal Councillor von Steiger said. On 4 August 1942,<br />

Rothmund drew up a presidential order which von Steiger and Philipp Etter,<br />

the Federal President, approved and which was only passed by the Federal<br />

Council in plenum retrospectively since it did not meet between 29 July and<br />

14 August 1942. This order closed with the remark that «in the future more<br />

foreign civilian refugees must therefore be refused entry, even if this might<br />

result in serious consequences for them (threat to life and limb)». 27<br />

The circular letter dated 13 August 1942 and sent by the Police Division to<br />

civil and military authorities laid down the measures to be taken. It stated that<br />

the influx of refugees and «in particular of Jews of all nationalities» was<br />

reaching a level similar to that of the exodus of Jews in 1938. In view of the<br />

country’s limited supply of food, of the need for internal and external security<br />

and of the impossible task of housing and supervising so many refugees, as well<br />

as finding them a third country to which they could emigrate, it was necessary<br />

to refuse them entry: «Refugees who have fled purely on racial grounds, e.g.,<br />

Jews, cannot be considered political refugees». Such people should be refused<br />

entry without exception. The first time they tried to enter Switzerland they<br />

should be simply sent back across the border; if they tried again they should be<br />

handed over to the relevant authorities on the other side. In practice, stateless<br />

refugees were subject to these regulations without the possibility of recourse,<br />

while the authorities were prepared to show more consideration towards<br />

refugees from countries such as Belgium and the Netherlands, whose exiled<br />

governments took steps to help their citizens. Deserters, escaped prisoners of<br />

war and other military personnel, political refugees in the strict sense of the<br />

word and so-called hardship cases – old people, the sick, children and pregnant<br />

women – should not be refused entry. 28 Against their better judgement, the<br />

authorities thus kept to the strict definition of a political refugee. While<br />

Rothmund likened the situation to a farce, a note in the unofficial minutes of<br />

the Police Directors’ Conference held on 28 August 1942, records von Steiger’s<br />

remarks: «Political refugees. Theory is no good. Jews are also in a way political<br />

refugees». 29<br />

114

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!