22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ook with the title «Vénus de Cyrène». It shows the interior view of a room<br />

with an open door. The book had been written by Josse Bernheim-Jeune and<br />

published privately.<br />

The Embassy rightly referred to the inclusion of this painting in the «Répertoire»<br />

of looted assets 145 and requested that the case be re-examined. However,<br />

the Federal Political Department held that it would not change its view even if<br />

new information became available. After all, even the Galerie Bernheim’s<br />

account books showed no trace of a sale of this painting and so the Department<br />

considered the case closed and forwarded it to the Kunstmuseum Basel. On the<br />

other hand, Georg Schmidt was of the opinion that this matter did not concern<br />

the Museum either, but only the Galerie Beyeler. But the Galerie Beyeler<br />

persisted with the information it had received in Paris, according to which the<br />

painting in question had been wrongly reported to the «Répertoire». The<br />

painting had been sold legally.<br />

When Beyeler acquired the painting in 1955, the «Répertoire» was already in<br />

existence. Beyeler had even consulted it. Although the painting figured in the<br />

«Répertoire», he doubted that the painting was a looted asset. He had obtained<br />

information in France that allowed him not to categorise the «Aryanisation» of<br />

the gallery and the collection as «looting». Despite this, neither Beyeler nor the<br />

Kunstmuseum Basel can be considered to have acted in good faith.<br />

Recent cases<br />

Since the rekindling of the restitution issue, new cases have also been appearing<br />

in Switzerland. In 1999, Max Liebermann’s «Nähschule im Waisenhais<br />

Amsterdam» was returned in an out-of-court settlement by the Stiftung<br />

Bündner Kunstsammlung to Gerta Silberberg, the daughter-in-law – now<br />

resident in Great Britain – of Breslau-based collector Max Silberberg who was<br />

murdered in Theresienstadt in 1942. The painting was sold to Adolf Jöhr by<br />

Silberberg in Berlin in 1934 through the publisher and art dealer Bruno<br />

Cassirer. From there it came to the Kunstmuseum Chur as a bequest in 1992.<br />

The painting had been exhibited in 1997/98 in Hamburg, Frankfurt, and<br />

Leipzig in a major exhibition of Liebermann’s works and was tracked down by<br />

a Berlin investigation agency.<br />

In 2001, the location of Camille Corot’s «L’Odalisque», whose whereabouts had<br />

been unknown for a long time, was clarified amicably by its original owner and<br />

the current owner. The painting had originally belonged to the Paris art dealer<br />

Josse Bernheim-Jeune, was «Aryanised» in 1941, and arrived by a tortuous<br />

route in Switzerland where it was finally bought in good faith by art dealer Peter<br />

Nathan, the son of Fritz Nathan, in 1959 from the Ursula Veraguth collection.<br />

Michel Dauberville, an heir of the Bernheim estate, whose family, like the<br />

478

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!