22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

was a small and neutral country which had endeavoured not to be diverted from<br />

tried and tested norms and had defended itself against attacks on its national<br />

sovereignty. The Allies, however, in particular the Americans, were unwavering<br />

in their demands for restitution, and met with a lack of understanding on the<br />

part of the Swiss. When the USA, Great Britain, and France insisted on<br />

Switzerland making reparation payments for the looted gold purchased from<br />

the Germans and lifting the bank secrecy laws for all German assets, there was<br />

no alternative but to send a Swiss delegation to Washington in March 1946.<br />

Swiss Minister Walter Stucki who headed the delegation, stated at the<br />

preparatory meeting in Bern that «his blood had boiled» when reading the<br />

notes of the Allies: «We are basically being treated as a conquered and occupied<br />

country. I can imagine much the same tone being used in a communication from<br />

the Allies to a German authority.» 131 In his opening speech in Washington,<br />

Stucki went so far as to compare the American «arsenal of democracy» to<br />

Hitler’s Germany. Such criticism became harsher in the following years with the<br />

onset of the Cold War. This position was maintained in the report entitled<br />

«West-East Trade» by Alfred Schaefer, the director general of the Union Bank<br />

of Switzerland. He writes in his report on a meeting with the director of the<br />

Federal Finance Administration, Max Iklé of 12 June 1952: «The Federal<br />

Council is truly outraged at the behaviour of the Americans, whose position fails<br />

to take into account the Swiss situation and is worse than their view of the<br />

Germans during the war.» 132 The Swiss delegation in Washington 1946 lost out<br />

to this attitude and had to pay 250 million francs as reparation for the purchases<br />

of looted gold from Germany. From the Swiss perspective, this was seen not as<br />

restitution, but rather as a voluntary contribution to the reconstruction of a<br />

Europe in ruins.<br />

At a later stage, there was once again more range of action for Switzerland in<br />

foreign policy. Both the ostracism and self-isolation lessened significantly in<br />

1947/48 with the increase in the East-West polarisation manifested in the Cold<br />

War: the «Western camp» was interested in good relations with Switzerland<br />

from every perspective, political, economic and military, and in turn<br />

Switzerland joined the Western economic community and community of values<br />

(Wirtschafts- und Wertegemeinschaft) along with the OEEC (today OECD) voluntarily,<br />

yet remained out of the UN and NATO. 133 The fast-growing antagonism<br />

between the victorious powers affected the attitude towards the conquered, and<br />

yesterday’s enemy became today’s ally. When a new discussion partner for the<br />

bilateral resolution of issues regarding assets from the war years was created in<br />

1949 with the birth of the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) at the same time<br />

as the Western defence alliance, Switzerland seized its opportunity. At the end<br />

of August 1952, it dissolved the Washington Agreement, which had become<br />

96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!