22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In cases where foreign exchange policies were supposed to be paid out outside<br />

Germany following their expiration date or redemption, the German currency<br />

authorities demanded assurances that the company would not demand foreign<br />

exchange from the Reichsbank, so that Germany’s foreign exchange and gold<br />

reserves would not be overstretched. In general, the Swiss insurance companies<br />

gave such assurances to the German authorities, although there were exceptions.<br />

Despite a clear and comprehensible legal basis, from 1937 on, one Swiss<br />

company – Basler Leben, whose clientele included many German Jews with<br />

foreign exchange policies – attempted to halt the payment of cancelled policies<br />

in Swiss francs as they would have had to import funds from Switzerland to<br />

Germany for this purpose. It considered such transfers to be irresponsible, as the<br />

«emigration of German Jews was thus financed on the back of the Swiss<br />

economy». 14<br />

In accordance with a law which came into force on 26 August 1938, all hard<br />

currency policies held by policyholders living in Germany had to be fully<br />

converted into reichsmarks. This step made it far more difficult for people who<br />

were contemplating emigration to acquire the necessary hard currency. Overall,<br />

the Swiss companies had to convert around 25,000 policies. One company,<br />

Basler Leben, welcomed the measure, as it was already concerned that it would<br />

have to resort to using Swiss reserves to settle German policies. The rest of the<br />

insurance sector initially protested against the measure, however. Koenig asked<br />

the Federal Political Department (Eidgenössisches Politisches Departement, EPD)<br />

whether such an approach, which he described as «the rape not only of the<br />

policyholders but also the companies», was legal; 15 The Department answered<br />

that these contracts were subjected to German law. Once the Swiss companies<br />

realised that they could not prevent the conversion, they successfully lobbied<br />

for a legal requirement for full conversion, which henceforth denied policyholders<br />

their freedom of choice; the advantage for the insurance companies was<br />

that they could now convert their covering funds to reichsmarks as well.<br />

Another controversial area was the willingness of Swiss insurance companies to<br />

pay out on German Jews’ confiscated policies. The companies were offered a<br />

declaration stating that in the event of later repayment claims by the policyholders<br />

concerned, the German state would indemnify the companies. Some<br />

Swiss insurance companies were satisfied with this assurance; one company,<br />

Rentenanstalt, initially rejected the German offer on the grounds that the<br />

policies contained an ownership clause (and would therefore have to be settled<br />

again on production of the policy in future); after mid 1940, however, it too<br />

paid out on confiscated policies in exchange for the appropriate renunciation<br />

declaration.<br />

The enactment of the 11 th Ordinance of the Law on German Citizenship<br />

290

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!