22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

their gold transactions and positive relations with Germany had prevented<br />

Germany from seriously considering the option of military operations against<br />

Switzerland. In other words, they argued that by providing financial services,<br />

Switzerland had – in effect – bought its freedom from German attack. This<br />

shifting of arguments retrospectively (for the purpose of self-justification) shows<br />

how important it is to differentiate analytically between intention and effect. It<br />

is quite possible that these economic relations and especially the provision of<br />

financial services had a «security effect» for Switzerland – but the argument that<br />

this outcome had been the chief motive for engaging in these transactions is<br />

based on twisted logic. One might just as well claim that with its «business as<br />

usual» approach, the SNB had effectively prevented Switzerland from using the<br />

convertibility of its currency as a trump card in the economic negotiations with<br />

Germany, thus neutralising the dissuasive potential. 14<br />

The second set of problems relates to the legality of the transactions; it thus<br />

concerns the Reichsbank’s dubious legal claim to a large part of the gold. The<br />

Reichsbank claimed that it was using its pre-war reserves for its sales to<br />

Switzerland, but the quantity of gold sold exceeded these holdings substantially.<br />

The Reichsbank’s published figure for its reserves on the eve of the war<br />

was just 124 million francs. However, informed observers pointed out that the<br />

actual holdings were much higher. There was an additional 358 million francs<br />

in «secret reserves» («stille Reserven»), and the Reichsbank had also acquired the<br />

gold owned by the Austrian and Czech national banks either just before or in<br />

the immediate aftermath of Germany’s annexation of these countries. A realistic<br />

estimate of the amount of gold held by the Reichsbank in September 1939<br />

(including the stocks of Austrian and Czech origin) is around 1,100 million<br />

francs – in other words, less than the amount of 1.6 to 1.7 billion francs sold to<br />

Switzerland. Germany also bought gold during the war (mostly from the Soviet<br />

Union), but this was not the major source of supply. Based on simple arithmetic<br />

and without any detailed investigation into the route taken by specific amounts<br />

of the precious metal, it is clear that some of the gold sold by the Reichsbank<br />

during the war could only have been acquired through the expropriation of<br />

central bank reserves, especially from Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg<br />

(totalling 1,582 million francs). The Reichsbank also boosted its stocks<br />

of gold through looting and expropriation of individuals: the Four-Year Plan<br />

authorities, who supervised the draconian exchange and currency controls,<br />

acquired gold worth 311 million francs. Gold expropriated from Holocaust<br />

victims in Eastern Europe and transferred to the Reichsbank in the 76 so-called<br />

«Melmer» consignments totalled 2,577 kg fine weight (with a value of<br />

12,549,442 francs).<br />

248

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!