22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(<strong>Schweiz</strong>erische Zentralstelle für Flüchtlingshilfe, SZF). In 1942 Alphons Koechlin,<br />

President of the Swiss Reformed Church Association (<strong>Schweiz</strong>erischer<br />

Kirchenbund), demanded both at a personal meeting and in written form in a<br />

private letter and in a communiqué, that the authorities implement the<br />

restrictive regulations less severely, whereupon the Geneva «Vie Protestante»<br />

magazine reproached him for favoring Jewish refugees and encouraging crime in<br />

Switzerland. 107 At the general meeting («Landsgemeinde») of the Young Church<br />

(«Junge Kirche») held on 30 August 1942, when Federal Councillor von Steiger<br />

compared Switzerland to a life-boat that was full, the Federal Council’s policy on<br />

refugees was personally and strongly criticised by Chief Justice Max Wolff,<br />

President of the Reformed Zurich Synod (Reformierte Zürcher Synode), and Walter<br />

Lüthi, a protestant minister from Basel. 108 The Reformed Church pastor Paul<br />

Vogt, who dealt with refugees, and Gertrud Kurz-Hohl, Head of the Christian<br />

Peace Service (Christlicher Friedensdienst), also tried several times to bring pressure<br />

to bear upon the authorities to change their policy. On 23 August 1942, for<br />

example, Gertrud Kurz made a special trip to the place where Federal Councillor<br />

von Steiger was vacationing. And in July 1944, Paul Vogt put before the Federal<br />

Council proposals for concrete measures to save 10,000 Hungarian Jews. The<br />

Federal Council replied that the «attention necessary» had been paid to the<br />

question, but that the interests of the army had to be taken into account: «As<br />

you know, the large number of foreigners represents a heavy burden and a daily<br />

impediment for our national defence system. It is becoming increasingly difficult<br />

to find accommodation for them.» 109 Although the attempts at a political level<br />

mentioned above were made by individuals, they included upper-level representatives<br />

of the Reformed Church. On the Catholic side, among the bishops for<br />

example, no such initiatives were taken in favour of the refugees, as far as is<br />

known. Not least out of deliberate national loyalty, the episcopate never criticised<br />

official policy on refugees and at times even explicitly approved it. In<br />

October 1942, Bishop Marius Besson declared, «our authorities are quite right<br />

in not practising an unqualified open-door policy and in taking all the necessary<br />

measures to maintain the welfare of the country». At the same time, and this<br />

shows the utter contradiction of his stand, he urged his followers to offer the<br />

«mass of extremely friendly refugees» the traditional «generous hospitality». 110<br />

The Lucerne moral theologian Alois Schenker, who was also President of the<br />

Caritas Refugee Committee (Flüchtlingskommission der Caritas), was one of the few<br />

exceptions. In October 1942, he criticised the stand adopted by the majority of<br />

the National Council, and indirectly that of Federal Councillor von Steiger as<br />

well, by describing the opinion which held that 9,000 immigrants were the<br />

maximum as «not commendable» and declaring that Switzerland would not<br />

stand the test of history. 111<br />

139

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!