22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Expenditure by the Central Directorate for Work Camps (Zentralleitung der<br />

Arbeitslager, ZLA) is difficult to assess, although it can be assumed that the net<br />

cost was 110 million francs. Apart from the work camps run by civilian authorities,<br />

other financial responsibilities also fell to the Confederation which<br />

assumed the costs for the army-run assembly camps, quarantine camps, and<br />

reception camps, from which people were allotted to work camps or refugee<br />

homes; for the expenses of the Police Division (around 30 million francs up to<br />

1950); for reimbursements to the army territorial service amounting to<br />

11 million francs; for expenditure on refugees who passed through Switzerland<br />

(namely in 1945) of around 1.7 million francs; and for the cost of running the<br />

EJPD Emigrants’ Office and the Refugee Section (5 million francs). 136<br />

In conclusion, it can be stated that between 1939 and 1945 Federal expenditure<br />

stemming from its refugee policy amounted to between 100 and<br />

103 million francs; up until 1954 expenditure rose to 136 or<br />

165.5 million francs, depending on the statistics used. A massive rise in Federal<br />

expenditure is to be noticed from 1943 on. The question of cost, which in<br />

particular had been raised earlier, was principally an argument put forward to<br />

justify restrictive measures that were, in reality, based on other considerations.<br />

The contributions made by the cantons varied greatly and were voluntary; either<br />

individual refugees or relief organisations were the beneficiaries. The proposal<br />

of a contribution towards overall Federal expenditure in this field was rejected<br />

by a clear majority. After 1942, the general opinion was still that refugee relief<br />

was a private matter, or at least the responsibility of the Federal authorities. The<br />

attitude of Arnold Seematter, a member of the Bern Cantonal government who<br />

in February 1943 objected to the generous use of Federal funds, proved to be<br />

symptomatic: «The people of Switzerland should bear the consequences of its<br />

generosity on its own.» 137 As far as the cantonal authorities were concerned, the<br />

question of financial contributions was brought up again only after the war in<br />

connection with permanent asylum when they, along with the Confederation<br />

and the relief organisations, had to foot a third of the bill for supporting the<br />

refugees who remained in Switzerland.<br />

3.5 Crossing over the Border and Staying in Switzerland<br />

On 22 August 1942, Eduard Gros crossed the Swiss border near Geneva<br />

together with Hubert and Paul Kan. Shortly after entering the country illegally,<br />

the three stateless Jews were arrested by the Geneva military police and driven<br />

to the German customs post of La Plaine, 138 situated on Swiss territory, and then<br />

sent off on foot to the border with occupied France. When the refugees caught<br />

151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!