22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Federal Council’s delegate for international relief organisations, Edouard de<br />

Haller, remarked that the matter would be discussed at UNRRA headquarters<br />

in London in order to obtain «if not an assurance for the ‹resorption› of the<br />

children, then at least support for ridding ourselves of them». 170<br />

In the debate surrounding Swiss refugee policy it is repeatedly claimed – as a<br />

defence against criticism or for reasons of relativism – that the Swiss attitude<br />

should be compared with that of other countries. Such comparisons are fraught<br />

with problems, however, owing to the different temporal, geographic, and<br />

political conditions prevailing at the time. 171 In addition, the availability of<br />

source material and the degree of research already carried out vary enormously<br />

from country to country.<br />

After France and Great Britain had admitted several thousand Jewish refugees<br />

during the months leading up to the outbreak of the war, it became more or less<br />

impossible to enter either country after September 1939, and naturally from<br />

June 1940 onward. While British policy was based on the transit principle,<br />

French pre-war policy did not oblige foreigners – Jewish or other – to continue<br />

to a third country, but subjected them to numerous controls of various types.<br />

At the outbreak of the war, thousands of Jews were interned in both countries<br />

as «enemy aliens», later leading up to the terrible fate which befell those in<br />

France. Between 1933 and 1945, there were around 20,000 refugees living in<br />

Great Britain on a temporary basis. These were joined by some 60,000 Jewish<br />

refugees who were able to take up residence there after the end of the war. 172<br />

Approximately 70,000 Jewish refugees were taken in by France between 1933<br />

and 1939.<br />

Since Britain wanted to avoid at all costs a rapprochement between Arab nationalists<br />

or Arab governments and the Axis powers, it kept the doors to Palestine<br />

closed from the beginning of 1939 on, apart from the five-year fixed quota of<br />

75,000 people. It was for this reason that Britain opposed most of the rescue<br />

projects, in particular in 1943 and 1944. A total of around 140,000 Jews<br />

emigrated to Palestine – legally or illegally – between 1933 and 1941. British<br />

policy on Palestine finally influenced decisions taken in Washington as well. The<br />

British Dominions played a negligible role in saving Jews; Canada was<br />

conspicuous by its almost total refusal to accept any Jewish immigrants, a policy<br />

which was largely due to the determined opposition of the Province of Quebec. 173<br />

With their admission of around 40,000 Jews, mostly German, up to the<br />

beginning of the war, the Netherlands followed a comparatively liberal policy<br />

on immigration, although here too restrictions were toughened after the annexation<br />

of Austria. Spain kept its borders open for Jewish and other refugees in<br />

transit throughout the duration of the war, in particular during the months<br />

following the fall of France and from 1943 until the end of the war without,<br />

166

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!