22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

interests of Switzerland. However, a few years later, as a result of the tenacious<br />

and skilful defence of German assets in Switzerland against claims made by the<br />

Allies, the former German owner received the major part of his money back.<br />

Camouflage was seen by the Germans as an expedient in a brief, non-global<br />

conflict affording plenty of loopholes. Until the invasion of the Soviet Union<br />

and the entry of the USA into the war, the trick worked, since it was possible,<br />

despite British dominance of the Atlantic, to maintain access to the American<br />

markets via the Soviet Union and Japan. IG Farben expressed its satisfaction in<br />

this regard as late as March 1941. For one thing, the successful maintenance of<br />

trading links was in this case based on camouflaged German branches in Latin<br />

America which had been handed over to confidential local agents. Mail was sent<br />

via another Zurich lawyer, Dr. Jakob Auer, who was one of the confidential<br />

agents working for IG Chemie and the Sturzenegger Bank. The conflict with<br />

France, which ended with its occupation in June 1940, also allowed some scope<br />

for camouflage activities. Thus, a German branch posing as neutral managed to<br />

escape detection until June 1940, when it dropped its mask. 20<br />

On the other hand, in the face of a long drawn-out, worldwide conflict, camouflage<br />

operations were just as inadequate as the potential of the German economy.<br />

Growing isolation from world markets limited Germany’s prospects in both<br />

respects. Countless camouflage companies found their way onto the Allies’<br />

blacklists. German agencies which were still recommending camouflage in<br />

1939/40 became increasingly sceptical in the second half of the war, and refused<br />

such measures. In the last phase of the war, they totally forbade the granting of<br />

any new approvals. Many camouflage operations ended up as meaningless<br />

organisational shells; some continued to play a role in the trafficking and<br />

relocation of looted goods, as in the case of Rodopia in Geneva for instance,<br />

which began by secretly buying back German securities held abroad, but later<br />

became an intermediary for the sale of stolen securities from the occupied<br />

regions. 21 In the end, the German defeat put a temporary stop to all conceivable<br />

options for preserving German interests abroad. In Germany, the Allies<br />

captured an impressive amount of documents shedding light on the existence<br />

of further camouflage operations which had until then remained undiscovered.<br />

The total occupation of Germany created a very different situation from that<br />

which had existed in 1918, and frustrated – as defeat became ever more<br />

inevitable – the plans of all those business owners who had hoped to see the<br />

circumstances of that first post-war period repeated. There is no documentary<br />

evidence to prove that camouflage companies which remained undiscovered in<br />

neutral states concealed extensive German resources from the Allies in the hope<br />

of returning them into German hands at a later date.<br />

376

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!