22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The machinery of Nazi legislation also specifically targeted assets abroad.<br />

According to a law passed on 19 November 1936, all people resident in<br />

Germany had to deposit their foreign shares with a designated German foreign<br />

exchange bank. In order to ensure that this regulation was respected, a further<br />

law against economic sabotage was passed shortly afterwards, according to<br />

which flight of capital could entail the death penalty. At the same time, the<br />

Nazi authorities subjected their victims to physical and psychological pressure<br />

in order to force them to turn over their assets. The Swiss banks complied with<br />

the instructions of their German customers signed at times under duress, and<br />

transferred securities to the German banks indicated. Between 1933 and 1939<br />

Credit Suisse, for example, transferred securities valued at around 8 million<br />

francs to Deutsche Bank 36, while the Zurich office of the Swiss Bank Corporation<br />

transferred securities totalling over 6 million francs in value in accordance<br />

with the 1936 Law on Compulsory Deposits (Depotzwangsgesetz).<br />

Furthermore, the Swiss Bank Corporation sold shares quoted in Switzerland for<br />

a total market value of 8 million francs on behalf of German customers who<br />

probably had to transfer these proceeds too to banks designated by the<br />

Reichsbank. A considerable number of such transfers took place in 1936, but<br />

transactions of this sort also continued during the war.<br />

Even though many of those persecuted had to withdraw their assets from the<br />

banks and despite the fact that Switzerland did not always prove to be an<br />

entirely safe haven, persecuted Jews were still well-advised to seek a safe destination<br />

for their assets if possible in or via Switzerland. Ever more frequently,<br />

they opened accounts which were then managed by bank employees or lawyers.<br />

Although the asset management mandates were seen as a problem by the banks,<br />

they did not take any effective measures against this development. The Swiss<br />

Bank Corporation drew up a list of such trustee accounts in November 1938 in<br />

an attempt to gain a clear view of the situation. Other banks later followed suit<br />

(in 1942).<br />

After the «Anschluss» (annexation of Austria) in 1938 and the introduction of<br />

Nazi legislation, Austrian capital and securities started to be rapidly withdrawn<br />

from Swiss accounts. 37 The Jewish population, who was subjected to persecution<br />

and pressure, handed over considerable assets to the Reichsbank. Some were also<br />

forced by local authorities to declare the existence of accounts in Switzerland.<br />

The banks transferred the corresponding amounts directly to the Nazi Treasury.<br />

At the same time, the banks were confronted with requests from the provisional<br />

administrators (kommissarische Verwalter) of «Aryanised» Jewish firms who<br />

wanted to take possession of the assets of the corresponding companies. The<br />

banks agreed on a common procedure and complied with the requests of the<br />

Austrian administrators if they bore the signature of the Jewish company<br />

275

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!