22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

country were subjected, was finally abolished. Gradually most of them were<br />

released from the internment camps and given cantonal residence permits<br />

which granted them the right to take on gainful employment. On the whole,<br />

the former refugees were grateful that they had survived the war in Switzerland.<br />

As to what had transpired beforehand, this can probably be summed up in a<br />

statement made by the Committee of Experts for Refugee Matters in March<br />

1945:<br />

«Over the past 4 years we have been able to give the refugees a roof over<br />

their heads, clothing and food [...] but we have not managed to make them<br />

feel happy in Switzerland.» 156<br />

Asset management<br />

The refugees’ stay in Switzerland was characterised by supervision and the<br />

removal of personal responsibility. This clearly emerges from the fact that the<br />

authorities confiscated the refugees’ valuables and cash once they crossed the<br />

border and their assets were handed over to the Federal Department of Justice<br />

and Police to be administered.<br />

The legal basis for this policy was provided by the Federal Council’s Decree of<br />

12 March 1943, according to which cash exceeding 100 francs, securities, and<br />

valuables belonging to refugees who had entered Switzerland after 1 August<br />

1942, were to be put under the control of the Federal authorities. Even before<br />

this date, however, asylum seekers had been forced to hand over their assets, with<br />

dubious legal justification; 157 in this sense, the Decree of March 1943 provided<br />

a legal basis for a procedure which was already being carried out in practice, but<br />

at the same time had proved to be problematic. On the one hand, confiscated<br />

assets disappeared, and on the other it can be shown from a list drawn up by the<br />

territorial command in Geneva, that in at least ten cases refugees whose modest<br />

assets had been confiscated in the reception camp were subsequently deported<br />

without their money having been handed back to them. 158<br />

Since the Decree of March 1943 applied only to those refugees who had entered<br />

Switzerland after August 1942, the Police Division attempted to obtain information<br />

about the assets of refugees and emigrants who had arrived earlier. The<br />

banks consistently applied the banking secrecy which, however, did not stop the<br />

Police Division from obtaining the information they wanted by citing the<br />

Federal Council’s Decree of 17 October 1939. If refugees did not respect the<br />

regulations concerning the handing over of their assets, they ran the risk of<br />

being deported or interned in a correctional institution. The Swiss Volksbank<br />

(SVB), a bank with a nationwide network of branches, was charged with<br />

managing the confiscated assets.<br />

158

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!