22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

epeatedly as justification. At the meeting held on 30 August 1942, Federal<br />

Councillor Eduard von Steiger justified closing Switzerland’s borders by<br />

comparing the country to a life-boat that was already full, at the same time<br />

referring to «limited supplies». 69 He voiced the same argument again in<br />

parliament in September 1942, saying: «Anyone who does not recognise this<br />

problem is ignoring the difficulties surrounding our economic negotiations and<br />

the seriousness of our situation.» 70 At the same meeting, however, pastor Walter<br />

Lüthi declared that it was extremely uncharitable to believe that a few tens of<br />

thousands of refugees could not be taken in and at the same time share the food<br />

available with perhaps 100,000 dogs. 71 Federal Councillor Marcel Pilet-Golaz,<br />

on the other hand, remarked in September 1942 in an internal note that «food<br />

supplies are not a problem at the moment» and declined the offer of an<br />

American aid organisation to provide food if Switzerland took in more<br />

refugees. 72 Thus, it turns out that the opinion on the question of food supplies<br />

differed and that its assessment depended less on the current supply situation<br />

and the future situation, which was difficult to foresee, than on basic attitudes<br />

concerning the refugee question. Naturally, the introduction of bread rationing<br />

on 16 October 1942 was sometimes linked to the presence of the refugees. At<br />

the same time the Federal Council emphasised that the sacrifices made by<br />

Switzerland «are nowhere near as great as those being made by other nations».<br />

Some people thought only about having enough to eat themselves, while others<br />

were at best prepared to make a small sacrifice in favour of those who had been<br />

persecuted. Due to the fact that food was rationed and the amount of land cultivated<br />

was increased, people living in Switzerland were comparatively well fed,<br />

with the result that a real emergency situation with regard to the supply of food,<br />

which would have justified the restrictive policy vis-à-vis refugees, never in fact<br />

arose. 73<br />

Concern about national security<br />

The issues of both internal and external security played a central role in Swiss<br />

policy on refugees. General Guisan showed concern about the presence of<br />

foreigners in the country since, if Switzerland went to war, they would<br />

constitute an additional risk factor. 74 In order to draw the government’s<br />

attention to the dangers of espionage, sabotage and infiltration, Guisan<br />

submitted a long report to the Federal Council on 4 May 1940 in which he<br />

recommended a series of preventive and defensive measures. These were mainly<br />

directed at Germans living in Switzerland but also concerned refugees:<br />

126<br />

«A further category of internal enemies is to a certain extent emigrants.<br />

[...] Dutch and English reports indicate that large numbers of Jewish

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!