22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

under duress to be between 50 and 100 million Swiss francs. 120 However, by<br />

1952 less than one million Swiss francs had been returned.<br />

6.6 Restitution of Looted Cultural Goods<br />

The entire restitution process in the range of cultural assets was confined to<br />

those objects stipulated by the British art protection officer Douglas Cooper and<br />

placed on a list of 75 items (later increased to 77) which was officially handed<br />

over to the Swiss authorities by the three Western powers in October 1945.<br />

Nineteen objects were originally British-owned, one Dutch-owned, and the<br />

remainder French-owned. With his records, Cooper laid the foundations for<br />

Swiss restitutions after 1945. In view of the evidence available, the implementation<br />

of a «Decree on Looted Assets» could no longer be avoided. The Swiss<br />

Federal Council, however, saw no reason to order a search for further looted<br />

pieces of art on its own initiative. After the war, not a single work was restituted<br />

that had not already been tracked down by Cooper. Moreover, the efforts of the<br />

French art dealer Paul Rosenberg show that in view of the inactivity of the Swiss<br />

authorities, claimants started to act on their own but with the risk that out-ofcourt<br />

settlements would bypass the test cases which the Allies had been striving<br />

for. The Swiss authorities would also have preferred to settle even the major<br />

looted art case involving the Gallerie Fischer «amicably». The Swiss Bankers<br />

Association did not want individual banks to be burdened with conducting<br />

their own investigations, it wanted to wait for concrete enquiries or claims from<br />

abroad:<br />

«The contents of closed deposits are not known to the banks. What is<br />

inside a bank’s vaults is generally packed and sealed, with the result that it<br />

is not possible to provide the accurate description of the item that is<br />

required. Also, bank officials would hardly be suitable for drawing up this<br />

kind of inventory.» 121<br />

As could be expected, the late deployment of the banks’ own clarifications had<br />

an effect on the results of the investigations. In a letter to the Federal Political<br />

Department dated 22 July 1946, the Swiss Clearing Office wrote that it was<br />

quite possible not only for documents but also for objects to have disappeared<br />

from 1943 onwards, especially once Cooper and Rosenberg had begun their<br />

search for looted art in 1945. Objects could be sold abroad illegally, withdrawn<br />

from exhibitions, and hidden in bank safes. The Clearing Office, for example,<br />

had not started its investigations into looted art at the Galerie Fischer until early<br />

472

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!