22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

students, as well as a high-school camp for Italian teenagers. 153 These changes<br />

can be largely explained by the progress of the war: thanks to the Allied<br />

victories, the end of the refugees’ stay in Switzerland could be foreseen. They<br />

began to appear more confident and demanded the right to have a say in their<br />

own future. As Switzerland’s situation changed with regard to the international<br />

state of affairs, the authorities on their part seemed to increasingly perceive the<br />

refugees as those who would shape the future of Europe, and therefore set new<br />

priorities in asylum policy. It was against this background that a Joint<br />

Commission (Commission mixte) was set up in June 1945 which dealt with the<br />

many problems that arose in the post-war period, such as the issue of stateless<br />

persons. Unlike the Federal Commission of Experts for Refugee Matters<br />

(Eidgenössische Sachverständigenkommission für Flüchtlingsfragen) that was set up in<br />

February 1944 and which included representatives of the relief organisations<br />

but none from among the refugees themselves, the refugees were now allowed<br />

to appoint their own delegates to the Joint Committee.<br />

Towards the end of the war, the question of the refugees’ future took on an everincreasing<br />

importance. In order to get an idea of the refugees’ own thoughts,<br />

the Central Office for Refugee Relief and the Swiss section of the International<br />

Migration Service organised a survey among them to obtain information about<br />

their plans for the future. The results of this survey, which was carried out for<br />

the first time in 1944, revealed that only a minority of 25% of the 5,000 or so<br />

refugees questioned wished to return to their own country. Refugees from<br />

Poland and Germany in particular categorically refused to be repatriated. The<br />

reasons were plain: 80% of those questioned were Jewish and did not wish to<br />

return to the country where they had been persecuted. Germans, Austrians and<br />

Poles feared a revival of anti-Semitism in their home countries; in addition<br />

many eastern European Jews had emigrated to the West long before the war and<br />

had been driven out of the country where they were staying only when it had<br />

been occupied by the Germans. The majority of the refugees preferred to<br />

migrate to a European country, while Palestine, where the political situation<br />

was still unclear at the time of the survey, was given as a desired destination by<br />

only 9% of the refugees. 154<br />

Many people, however, simply did not have the strength to start a new life for<br />

the third, fourth or fifth time. For some time, the relief organisations had been<br />

demanding that they be given permanent residence in Switzerland. After the<br />

Federal Council’s initial push for a quick departure of the refugees, it agreed in<br />

1947 to issue permanent residence permits: with certain restrictions, the<br />

Federal Council Decree of 7 March 1947 provided permanent asylum for<br />

refugees who could not be expected to migrate to another country yet again. 155<br />

In 1951, the obligation to leave Switzerland, to which those refugees still in the<br />

157

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!