22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

members of the management. In any case, on 4 May 1940 the committee<br />

came to the conclusion «that deliveries to Germany are out of the question<br />

for us at the present time». 22 By 4 July 1940, things had changed. Iwan Bally<br />

now referred «in general to the urgent need to create jobs, and in particular<br />

the need to revive exports, paying special attention to the clearing surplus<br />

which currently exists in favour of Germany». This clearing surplus needed<br />

«to be paid off as quickly as possible through the supply of goods». In order<br />

to avoid breaching the blockade treaty with Britain, Bally continued, it was<br />

necessary to ensure «that our company operates within the bounds of the<br />

‹courant normal›»; any larger quantities would require the involvement of the<br />

shoe industry as a whole, in order to put pressure on the Swiss-Allied<br />

Commission mixte. 23<br />

The clearing loans created the requirement for an export policy developed by<br />

sharp-minded negotiators, and one which most businesses went along with once<br />

Switzerland was encircled by the Axis powers. Within the Swiss negotiating<br />

delegation, the dominant impression was that Germany «[is] currently very<br />

close to us, and Britain [...] very far away». 24 In this phase, with Germany at the<br />

peak of its military power, it seemed possible to achieve an optimum reconciliation<br />

of corporate strategy, national interests, and policy towards Germany.<br />

Thus Homberger explained at a meeting of the Swiss Chamber of Commerce<br />

(<strong>Schweiz</strong>erische Handelskammer) in May 1941 that one had to keep in mind the<br />

«future structure of Europe» and focus on «constructive co-operation».<br />

Switzerland’s own «sacrifices» should «help to maintain the independence of<br />

our country». 25 Here we can see that foreign trade policy was identical with<br />

foreign policy and/or defence policy.<br />

Germany’s plans for using Switzerland as an extended «workbench», and<br />

integrating Switzerland’s economic potential into Germany’s own efforts to arm<br />

itself, did not, however, always work out. 26 Attempts by German ministerial<br />

bureaucracies, the Wehrmacht, and the newly created departments within the<br />

Nazi regime, to impose a buyer’s market in Switzerland, achieved only initial<br />

success. Complaints from the German industrial commission (Deutsche Industriekommission),<br />

which had been based in Bern since spring 1941, from where it<br />

attempted to co-ordinate and strengthen the incoherent German ordering,<br />

purchasing and procurement process, continued unabated. However, the<br />

German decision-makers hoped that the economic incorporation of Switzerland<br />

into the «New Europe» would also produce an effect in terms of political ideals:<br />

together with the Scandinavian and south-eastern European nations,<br />

Switzerland was to be encouraged to play an active role in a wider European<br />

economy («Europäische Grossraumwirtschaft»). But the propaganda campaigns<br />

188

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!