22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SS member Helmuth Maurer and the Zurich Cantonal Bank illustrates that in<br />

some circumstances such bank accounts were used to move millions in gold and<br />

currency; yet Maurer does not appear on any of the Nazi lists used. The account<br />

was discovered because it was reported by the bank when the obligation to<br />

register German assets was implemented in 1945. 35<br />

The more prominent and exposed a person was in Nazi Germany, the less likely<br />

it is that an openly declared bank account existed, as this would have been<br />

tantamount to committing an offence against the various foreign exchange laws<br />

under the threat of severe punishment. In the run-up to the Nuremberg trials,<br />

the Americans had every opportunity to put pressure on the «principal war<br />

criminals» who were later convicted, and to undertake appropriate follow-up<br />

investigations. In none of these cases was anything found. Even a man like<br />

Hermann Goering, whose grasping business acumen is legendary and who<br />

regularly sent emissaries to Switzerland, left no identifiable bank account. 36 It<br />

would, however, be wrong to conclude that no significant assets from convicted<br />

Nazis were moved into or through Switzerland. The American operation<br />

«Safehaven» assumed – justifiably – that such a situation could arise, just as it<br />

had happened after World War I. Nevertheless, all the evidence suggests that<br />

such movements of assets did not take the form of ordinary bank accounts. It is<br />

much more likely that assets were held by confidential agents such as trustees,<br />

lawyers, or businessmen of various kinds.<br />

Even in those cases where an account existed for a time, it made sense to ensure<br />

that it disappeared well before the end of the war. 37 The freezing of German<br />

assets had been discussed for several months before it took place on 16 February<br />

1945. When again months later, from autumn 1945 onwards, the safe deposit<br />

boxes rented by Germans were systematically opened, around ten per cent were<br />

completely empty. For various people who maintained intensive contacts in<br />

Switzerland throughout the war, such as the staff of Hermann Goering’s Four<br />

Year Plan Authority (Vierjahresplanbehörde), no account was ever found. These<br />

particularly well-informed groups with multiple connections in Switzerland<br />

had access, by virtue of their official functions, to other ways of making transfers<br />

of their own money as well in the final phase of the war, and thus providing for<br />

their post-war lives. This raises the question of whether and to what extent<br />

Switzerland became a refuge or stopping off point for fleeing Nazis.<br />

Transit: Switzerland as a temporary place of asylum and stopping-off point<br />

Carl Ludwig’s report on Swiss refugee policy, published in 1957, sums up the<br />

situation as follows: «Occasional reports in the foreign press that asylum had<br />

been granted to war criminals were pure invention. But Switzerland did not<br />

issue any denial.» 38 Although there have been no systematic investigations, it<br />

382

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!