22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

situation. 83 As was customary, the Federal Council often approved proposals<br />

made by the head of a Federal department and his team of civil servants,<br />

including those concerning policy on refugees. For this reason the Federal<br />

Department of Justice and Police becomes the focus of attention.<br />

The EJPD was more or less solely responsible for two crucial areas. Firstly, since<br />

the end of the First World War, it had drawn up the ideological and legal basis<br />

for Swiss population policy and between the wars it had implemented a policy<br />

on foreigners that had an anti-Semitic bias. As regards the theoretical underpinning<br />

of Swiss population policy, it was not so much Heinrich Rothmund as<br />

Max Ruth, a lawyer who was well known at the time but has since hardly been<br />

taken notice of, who played the main role. 84 Secondly, after the outbreak of the<br />

war, the EJPD was the principal body responsible for implementing policy on<br />

refugees, as between 1938 and 1942 responsibilities were shifted from the<br />

cantonal to the Federal authorities. With its numerous instructions and circular<br />

letters, the EJPD largely determined how policy on refugees was put into<br />

practice. Decisions – without further appeal – concerning whether (non-<br />

«political») refugees were to be admitted or turned back were taken by the<br />

Police Division, often in fact by Heinrich Rothmund personally. It is a known<br />

fact that there were strong xenophobic and anti-Semitic tendencies within the<br />

EJPD and that the Police Division concentrated its efforts on refusing<br />

admission to refugees. At the same time, the EJPD was not the only factor to<br />

influence Swiss policy on refugees. This policy was drawn up in consultation<br />

with other Federal departments, the Swiss parliament, the cantonal authorities<br />

and other interest groups. Economic interests, for example, were also taken into<br />

account, which is why the Federal Department of Economic Affairs was also<br />

often involved in the decision-making process. The border police, whose job it<br />

was to control Switzerland’s borders, was responsible to the Federal Department<br />

of Finance and Customs (Eidgenössisches Finanz- und Zolldepartement, EFZD),<br />

which is why the latter was regularly consulted by the EJPD and tried to exert<br />

influence on its own initiative. In relation to policy on refugees the strongest<br />

player in the Federal administration, however, was the Political Department.<br />

The Federal Political Department and the Delegate for International Relief<br />

Organisations<br />

The Federal Political Department (Eidgenössisches Politisches Dempartement, EPD)<br />

had little say in drawing up internal policy on refugees; it did, however, have a<br />

large degree of responsibility insofar as many questions concerning refugees<br />

touched on foreign policy. The EPD was particularly influential with regard to<br />

negotiations with other countries on the question of refugees. This was clearly<br />

the case, for example, in the agreement with Germany on the subject of the<br />

130

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!