22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

consequences – as well as from the principle of minimum guarantees under international<br />

law that the Federal administration had long supported. 61<br />

Foreign Jews in Switzerland suffered most from discrimination. After the First<br />

World War, if not before, naturalisation procedures were systematically made<br />

more difficult for them in comparison with non-Jewish foreigners; from 1919<br />

on, their files were specially marked, not systematically but in many cases, for<br />

internal administrative reasons, for example with the Star of David or the «J»stamp.<br />

62 With the introduction of compulsory visas for German «non-Aryans»<br />

in October 1938 the authorities finally based their immigration requirements<br />

on the categories laid down in the Nuremberg racial laws. In the administration,<br />

the categories «Aryan» and «non-Aryan» were frequently used, and<br />

«Aryan» identification papers were issued in the case of marriages with<br />

Germans or for work permits for Germany. 63<br />

Economic protectionism<br />

Unemployment and the fear of added competition on the labour market played<br />

a certain role, these motives being far more justified in the 1930s than during<br />

the war when unemployment was low and there was even an inadequate supply<br />

of labour in some sectors. The government took these fears into account insofar<br />

as, in principle, it forbade emigrants and refugees to take up gainful<br />

employment as early as 1933. The main aim of this step was to protect the<br />

internal labour market; a desired side-effect, however, was that this made it<br />

virtually impossible for refugees to integrate into Swiss social life and put added<br />

pressure on them to leave for a third country as quickly as possible. In practice,<br />

it was therefore more or less impossible for refugees to compete with Swiss<br />

workers, and in cases where this was contingently possible – for example, in<br />

connection with simplified admission procedures owing to the prestige of<br />

«famous authors» – professional bodies objected to foreign competition. 64<br />

The consideration for Swiss citizens living abroad was advanced time and again<br />

and, as things turned out, was only rarely or only to a limited extent respected.<br />

However, it was an additional argument for forbidding refugees to work. In<br />

November 1938, Rothmund explained:<br />

«Under no circumstances can we allow emigrants to take up gainful<br />

employment of any kind on the Swiss labour market. The unemployed in<br />

this country, among whom there are many Swiss citizens who have come<br />

back from abroad, would rightly be up in arms.» 65<br />

It must be said, however, that there were also contrary economic interests. In<br />

the 1920s in particular, differences of opinion arose between the Federal Police<br />

124

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!