22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Nobel AG in Bratislava. The banks continued to lend money to IG Farben in<br />

1941 and 1942. The SBC even helped the company out in enemy territory in<br />

1943 when it granted IG Farben loans in pounds sterling for the purchase of<br />

Romanian oil shares. It is extremely difficult to determine today how these<br />

loans were in fact used and, in view of the interchangeable character of money,<br />

it is in many cases impossible. Basically, they offered the possibility of<br />

purchasing foreign exchange. It is not possible, however, to establish a direct<br />

link between these loans and, for example, the funding of the enormous<br />

IG Farben chemical plant in the vicinity of the Auschwitz concentration camp.<br />

The loans were probably used for importing raw materials that may well have<br />

been used in Auschwitz-Monowitz. For the Swiss banks the main purpose of<br />

these loans was to deconcentrate the open credit items and regroup them among<br />

financially strong debtors which, if Germany were to lose the war, would offer<br />

the most security.<br />

In some cases, Swiss loans were used for constructing buildings which, forming<br />

an immediate part of the military infrastructure, were also connected to the<br />

Nazi genocide. In 1941 and 1942, for example, the Union Bank of Switzerland<br />

and the Swiss Bank Corporation tendered for the financing of a supply of<br />

wooden sheds from Switzerland to the Wehrmacht and the SS. The transaction<br />

was completed in an unusual and covert way; in addition, bribes were paid to a<br />

series of well-positioned middlemen including General Guisan’s son, Henry<br />

Guisan, who received a commission of 13,000 francs. 18<br />

Other transactions, equally questionable, were carried out by less central institutions.<br />

For example the <strong>Schweiz</strong>erische Bodenkreditanstalt (SBKA), a<br />

mortgage bank associated with Credit Suisse, gradually specialised in liquidating<br />

those non-transferable German liabilities (in so-called Sperrmark, i.e.,<br />

blocked marks) towards Swiss banks which had originated with the debt<br />

moratoria of 1933 and 1934. 19 The Bodenkreditanstalt developed various<br />

methods of liquidating or indirectly transferring stocks of marks that were<br />

frozen in Germany. For this purpose it built up a network of personal contacts<br />

including Wilhelm Frick, a Zurich lawyer, and Wilhelm Oeding, a confidant<br />

of Hermann Goering. The SBKA would obtain a permit to pay for goods and<br />

raw materials imported from Germany in Sperrmark and to be credited the<br />

purchase price by the Swiss buyers in Swiss francs. These sorts of transactions<br />

always involved considerable bribes or commissions. During the war years, the<br />

transactions became more complicated and obtaining a permit to use Sperrmark<br />

involved ever more time-consuming conditions such as supplying strategically<br />

important goods to Germany. In this way, 3% of the total German demand for<br />

tungsten, which was essential for the production of special steel, was supplied<br />

to the Third Reich through the offices of the Bodenkreditanstalt.<br />

267

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!