22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

while reassuring to the collector that the works in question would be on loan to<br />

the Swiss museum concerned. When a painting was sold, the import duties were<br />

generally charged to the purchaser, thus relieving the burden on Jewish owners<br />

who were usually short of foreign exchange. By declaring that the item was a<br />

loan, the German collector was exempt not only from import duty but also from<br />

emigration tax or other compulsory taxes and levies as, in formal terms, the<br />

transaction did not constitute a permanent transfer of an asset or a sale abroad.<br />

This made the Swiss museums an extremely attractive option.<br />

In return, the museums – as a result of the influx of flight goods during the<br />

1930s, but especially during the Second World War – had access to a wealth of<br />

exhibition material which was made available to them free of charge. During<br />

the Second World War, when the movement of loaned artefacts became virtually<br />

impossible in Europe, this opportunity to organise exhibitions gained tremendously<br />

in importance. The Kunstmuseum Basel, the Kunsthaus Zurich, and the<br />

Kunstmuseum Winterthur alone obtained at least 1,000 paintings and<br />

drawings in this way. Compared with the large number of Jewish-owned<br />

deposits, very few non-Jewish collections were available. These included, for<br />

example, the collection owned by the banker Baron von der Heydt, who had<br />

relocated to Ascona as early as 1930. The figure of around 1,000 deposits is<br />

doubled if the deposits by German artists and collectors who were persecuted<br />

in the purge of «degenerate art» («Aktion Entartete Kunst») are included. On<br />

average, from each of the larger collections (flight assets) deposited in museums,<br />

one to two works were purchased for the museum concerned.<br />

For the Jewish owners who wanted or were forced to sell off their works of art<br />

item by item, the various exhibitions served as useful publicity. By being<br />

displayed in public, the works of art were rated «museum worthy», which<br />

encouraged sales, and they could be promoted to a wider public at the same<br />

time. Often, the exhibitions were followed very quickly by the auctions held by<br />

the Lucerne dealer and gallery-owner Theodor Fischer, who sold a substantial<br />

proportion of these flight assets at his auctions. Between 1933 and 1947,<br />

Fischer organised 47 auctions in total; most of the «emigrant auctions» took<br />

place between 1939 and 1942. By the time the auction took place, most<br />

emigrants had already left Switzerland. Often, the goods had to be offered at<br />

follow-up actions with higher deductions for the auctioneer. Fischer also<br />

purchased art at these auctions; indeed, he was the main buyer. Some of the<br />

cultural assets disposed of through auction, direct resale or exchange found their<br />

way back to Germany; there is documentary evidence of an exchange occurring<br />

after the Lucerne auction of the Julius Freund collection in March 1942.<br />

357

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!