22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

individual. 23 Reparations do not include the spoils of war (i.e. property won in<br />

battle) or restitutions. The concept of restitution in international law relates to<br />

«the return of items illegally removed by defeated countries from occupied<br />

territories». 24 Restitution as practised by the Allies was governed by Military<br />

Government Law 52, issued by the US in the wake of the military advance on<br />

18 September 1944. In its first version, it stipulated that the Military<br />

Government would be responsible for examining restitutable property. Article<br />

2 stated that:<br />

«Property which has been the subject of duress, wrongful acts of confiscation,<br />

dispossession or spoliation from territories outside GERMANY,<br />

whether pursuant to legislation or by procedures purporting to follow<br />

forms of law or otherwise, is hereby declared to be equally subject to seizure<br />

of possession or title, direction, management, supervision or otherwise<br />

being taken into control by Military Government.» 25<br />

After the end of the war, machinery, ships, railway rolling stock, motor vehicles,<br />

holdings in companies, stocks and shares, works of art, looted gold and even<br />

livestock, wines and spirits were restituted. The interests of the Allies diverged.<br />

Whereas at Potsdam the Soviet Union had proposed a broad definition of the<br />

term in order to gain additional opportunities to appropriate and exhaust<br />

Germany’s economic potential as well as reparations, the USA and Britain were<br />

trying to contain restitutions within a certain limit – the former, because they<br />

were interested in building up the German economy again, and the latter because<br />

they were interested in procuring the greatest possible reparations. All in all,<br />

what this shows is that it was difficult (and still is difficult for historical research)<br />

to draw a clear demarcation line between reparations and restitutions. 26<br />

The Allies’ demands for restitution and reparations, combined with the establishment<br />

of the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg, were an<br />

expression of the same attempt to end the war with the just punishment of the<br />

guilty parties. It was the Americans in particular who pushed for the establishment<br />

of an international military tribunal to pass sentence on the principal<br />

German war criminals in order to call them to account as quickly as possible.<br />

This tribunal was established under the London Agreement (by the USA, Great<br />

Britain, the USSR, and France). The first of what became known as the<br />

Nuremberg trials began on 20 November 1945 and lasted until 31 August<br />

1946. Unlike what happened after the First World War, a deliberate decision<br />

was made to accuse individuals rather than states. The trials, which took place<br />

in the international spotlight, served not only to punish war criminals but also<br />

to shed light on the extent to which the Nazi economy was based on robbery<br />

430

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!