22.01.2013 Views

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

61340 Vorabseiten_e - Unabhängige Expertenkommission Schweiz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the decisions made. As far as refugee policy was concerned, the Federal Council’s<br />

decisions were in fact never rejected; on the contrary, the parliamentary<br />

committees which assisted the government by emergency plenary powers were<br />

consulted in advance on important issues – for example the Federal Council’s<br />

Decree of 12 March 1943 concerning accommodation for refugees – in order to<br />

avoid the Federal Council’s being compromised at a later stage. The Swiss<br />

parliament therefore not only approved the basic elements of the Federal<br />

Council’s policy on refugees but in fact helped to shape it.<br />

The cantonal authorities<br />

Under the strongly federalist administrative system prevailing in Switzerland,<br />

the cantons enjoyed a good deal of authority in matters of policy on refugees up<br />

until 1938 in that they issued tolerance permits; between 1938 and 1942 these<br />

powers were gradually ceded to the Federal authorities. At the same time they<br />

had considerable room to manoeuvre in the way in which they implemented<br />

Federal policy. To a certain extent it was the cantonal police authorities who<br />

decided whether refugees should be admitted or turned back at the border, and<br />

they were also responsible for actually deporting refugees. In addition the<br />

cantonal authorities were empowered to issue their own regulations concerning<br />

the stay of refugees in Switzerland. The reduction of the cantonal authorities’<br />

powers was only partly due to Federal measures aimed at centralisation; it also<br />

resulted from the fact that the cantons were unable to agree on a common policy.<br />

This is illustrated by the fact that some cantons which adopted a particularly<br />

restrictive policy after the annexation of Austria, systematically expelled their<br />

refugees to other cantons. Finally in 1942, the majority refused to take in a<br />

greater number of refugees and reluctance to divide the financial burden fairly<br />

among the cantons as well as between the Federal and cantonal authorities was<br />

so strong, that the Federal Council withdrew its proposals in this respect and<br />

decided in March 1942 on the one hand to centralise all powers and, on the<br />

other, to relieve the cantons of all financial obligations.<br />

To what extent did the cantonal authorities share joint responsibility for<br />

national policy on refugees? The minutes of the Conference of the Cantonal<br />

Police Directors provide a clear picture of the varying attitudes among the<br />

cantonal authorities and of the pressure exerted by the majority of them on the<br />

EJPD regarding a restrictive policy. It is true to say that the cantons often<br />

adopted a position only after decisions had been taken in Bern; but they almost<br />

always confirmed the policy adopted by the Federal authorities, which in turn<br />

had an influence on further Federal measures. For example, the cantons<br />

indicated their approval of the decision to close the borders taken on 18 August<br />

1938; after all borders were closed on 13 August 1942, the cantons declared<br />

136

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!