PhylogÃ©nie Et Evolution Du Comportement Social Chez Les Blattes ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Ré f é r e n c e s b i b l i o g r a p h i q u e sAanen, D. K., P. Eggleton, C. Rouland-Lefèvre, T. Guldberg-Froslev, S. Rosendahl et J. J. Boomsma.2002. The evolution of fungus-growing termites and their mutualistic fungal symbionts. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci 99:14887-14892.Aanen, D. K. et P. Eggleton. 2005. Fungus-growing termites originated in african rain forest. CurrentBiology 15:851-855.Abbott, A. 1995. SEQUENCE ANALYSIS: new methods for old ideas. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 21:93-113.Abbott, A. et A. Tsay. 2000. Sequence analysis and optimal matching methods in sociology: reviewand prospect. Sociological methods & research 29:3-33.Abe, T. 1987. Evolution of life types in termites. Pages 125-148 in Evolution and coadaptation inbiotic communities. (S. Kawano, J. H. Connell et T. Hidaka, eds.) University of Tokyo Press,Tokyo.Abe, T., D. E. Bignell et M. Higashi. 2000. Termites: evolution, sociality, symbioses, ecology, KluwerAcademic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands.Adamowicz, S. J. et A. Purvis. 2006. From more to fewer? Testing an allegedly pervasive trend in theevolution of morphological structure. Evolution 60:1402-1407.Ahmad, M. 1950. The phylogeny of termite genera based on imago-worker mandibles. Bulletin of theAmerican Museum of Natural History 95:37-86.Alain (Chartier Emile). 1932. Propos sur l’éducation, Paris : Les Presses universitaires de France, 1967,13 ème édition, 202 pp.Albrecht, H. 1966. Zur Stammesgeschichte einiger Bewegungsweisen bei Fischen, untersucht amVerhalten von Haplochromis (Pisces, Cichlidae). Z. Tierpsychol. 23:270-301.Alexander, R. D. 1974. The evolution of social behavior. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5:325-383.Allee, W. C. 1931. Animal aggregations: a study in general sociology, University of Chicago Press,Chicago.Altmann, S. A. 1965. Sociobiology of rhesus monkeys: II, stochastics of social communication. Journalof Theoretical Biology 8:490-522.Altmann, J. 1974. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227-267.Altschul, S. F., T. L. Madden, A. A. Schäffer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller et D. J. Lipman. 1997.Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs.Nucleic Acids Research 25:3389-3402.Alverdes, F. 1927. Social life in the animal world, Harcourt, Brace, London.Ame, J.-M., C. Rivault et J.-L. Deneubourg. 2004. Cockroach aggregation based on strain odourrecognition. Animal Behaviour 68:793-801.Antonovics, J. et P. H. van Tienderen. 1991. Ontoecogenophyloconstraints? The chaos of constraintterminology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6:166-168.Archie, J. W. 1985. Methods for Coding Variable Morphological Features for Numerical TaxonomicAnalysis. Systematic Zoology 34:326-345.Atz, J. W. 1970. The application of the idea of homology to behavior. Pages 53-74 in Development andevolution of behavior (L. R. Aronson, E. Tobach, D. S. Lehrman, J. S. Rosenblatt et W. H.Freeman, eds.) San Fransisco.Austin, J. W., A. L. Szalanski et B. J. Cabrera. 2004. Phylogenetic analysis of the subterranean termitefamily Rhinotermitidae (Isoptera) by using the mitochondrial cytochrome oxydase II gene.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 97:548-555.Baerends, G. P. 1958. Comparative methods and the concept of homology in the study of behaviour.Archives néerlandaises de zoologie - Supplément 13:401-417.Bakeman, R. et V. Quera. 1995. Analyzing interaction: Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ,Cambridge University Press, New York.Baker, R. H. et R. DeSalle. 1997. Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny ofHawaiian Drosophila. Systematic Biology 46:654-673.Barriel, V. et P. Tassy. 1998. Rooting with multiple outgroups : consensus versus parsimony. Cladistics14:193-200.Bartz, S. H. 1979. Evolution of eusociality in termites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 76:5764-5768.256
Ré f é r e n c e s b i b l i o g r a p h i q u e sBatra, S., W., T. 1966. Nests and social behavior of halictine bees of India (Hymenoptera: Halictidae).Indian J. Entomol. 28:375-393.Bayly, M. J., F. Udovicic, A. K. Gibbs, C. Parra-O. et P. Y. Ladiges. 2007. Ribosomal DNApseudogenes are widespread in the eucalypt group (Myrtaceae): implications for phylogeneticanalysis. Cladistics (in press).Bell, W. J., R. E. Gorton, M. K. Tourtellot et M. D. Breed. 1979. Comparison of male agonistic behaviorin five species of cockroaches. Insectes Sociaux 26:252-263.Bergsten, J. 2005. A review of long-branch attraction. Cladistics 21:163-193.Bergstrom, T. C. 2002. Evolution of social behavior: individual and group selection. Journal ofEconomic Perspectives 16:67-88.Beutel, R. G. et S. N. Gorb. 2001. Ultrastructure of attachment specializations of hexapods(Arthropoda): evolutionary patterns inferred from a revised ordinal phylogeny. Journal ofZoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 39:177-207.Bininda-Edmonds, O. R. P., J. E. Jeffery, M. I. Coates et M. K. Richardson. 2002. From Haeckel toevent-pairing: the evolution of developmental sequences. Theory Biosci. 121:297-320.Bitsch, C. et C. Noirot. 2002. Gut characters and phylogeny of the higher termites (Isoptera: Termitidae).A cladistic analysis. Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. (N.S.) 38:201-210.Boudreaux, H. B. 1979. Arthropod phylogeny with special reference to insects, Wiley, New York.Branham, M. A. et J. W. Wenzel. 2003. The origin of photic behavior and the evolution of sexualcommunication in fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Cladistics 19:1-22.Breed, M. D., C. M. Hinkle et W. J. Bell. 1975. Agonistic behavior in the German cockroach, Blattellagermanica. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 39:24-32.Bremer, K. 1988. The limits of amino acids sequence data in Angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction.Evolution 42:795-803.Bremer, K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10:295-304.Brooks, D. R. et D. A. McLennan. 1991. Phylogeny, ecology, and behavior: a research program incomparative biology, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois. 434 p.Buchli, H. 1958. L’origine des castes et les potentialités ontogénétiques des termites européens dugenre Reticulitermes Holmgren. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Zoologie. 11:261-429.Cancello, E. M. et O. DeSouza. 2004. A new species of Glossotermes (Isoptera): reappraisal of the genericstatus with transfer from the Rhinotermitidae to the Serritermitidae. Sociobiology 44:1-19.Cap, H., S. Aulagnier et P. Deleporte. 2002. The phylogeny and behaviour of Cervidae (RuminantiaPecora). Ethology, Ecology & Evolution 14:199-216.Carranza, S., G. Giribet, C. Ribera, J. Baguna et M. Riutort. 1996. Evidence that two types of 18SrDNA coexist in the genome of Dugesia (Schmidtea) mediterranea (Platyhelminthes, Turbellaria,Tricladida). Molecular Biology and Evolution 13:824-832.Chatfield, C. et R. E. Lemon. 1970. Analysing sequences of behavioural events. Journal of TheoreticalBiology 29:427-445.Clark, D. C., S. Hossain, C. A. Burnside et S. Kambhampati. 2001. Coevolution between a cockroachand its bacterial endosymbiont : a biogeographical perspective. Proceedings of the RoyalSociety of London B 268:393-398.Cocroft, R. B. 2001. Vibrational communication and the ecology of group-living, herbivorous insects.American Zoologist 41:1215-1221.Coddington, J. A. 1988. Cladistic tests of adaptational hypotheses. Cladistics 4:3-22.Coelho, B. W. T. 2002. The biology of the primitively eusocial Augochloropsis iris (Schrottky, 1902)(Hymenoptera, Halictidae). Insectes sociaux 49:181-190.Cope, E. D. 1896. The Primary Factors of Organic Evolution, Open Court Publishing, Chicago.Costa, J. T. et T. D. Fitzgerald. 1996. Developments in social terminology: semantic battles in aconceptual war. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11:285-289.Costa, J. T. 1997. Caterpillars as social insects. Amer. Sci. 85:150-159.Crespi, B. et D. Yanega. 1995. The definition of eusociality. Behavioral Ecology 6:109-115.Cruickshank, R. H. et A. M. Paterson. 2006. The great escape : do parasites break Dollo’s law? Trendsin Parasitology 22:509-515.257
Page 1:
UFR des Sciences de la VieEcole Doc
Page 4 and 5:
Je remercie toutes les personnes av
Page 7 and 8:
Ta b l e d e s Mat i è r e sRe m e
Page 9 and 10:
Données moléculaires sans les sé
Page 11:
Ch a p i t r e V : Di s c u s s i o
Page 14 and 15:
Figure 3.10 : Analyse cladistique d
Page 17 and 18:
Li s t e d e s Ta b l e au xTableau
Page 19:
In t r o d u c t i o nNothing in bi
Page 22 and 23:
Ev o l u t i o n d u c o m p o r t
Page 24 and 25:
Page 27 and 28:
I. An a ly s e d u c o n t e x t e
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 61 and 62:
II. Mat é r i e l s e t m é t h o
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65:
ABCDEGHFJIK
Page 68 and 69:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111:
Page 115 and 116:
III. Réversibilité, c o n t r a i
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187:
CHAPITRE IVEv o l u t i o n d e s c
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225: Ev o l u t i o n d u c o m p o r t
Page 259 and 260: V. Dis c u s s ion g é n é r a l
Page 271: V. Dis c u s s ion g é n é r a l
Page 291 and 292: ANNEXE IDéf i n i t i o n s deq u
Page 293 and 294: ANNEXE IIPr o t o c o l e d’ex t
Page 295 and 296: ANNEXE IIILeg e n d r e et al . (Bi
Page 297 and 298: An n e x e sAbstractA new method is
Page 299 and 300: An n e x e sexpressed in such non-s
Page 301 and 302: An n e x e sanother species would a
Page 303 and 304: An n e x e sMolecular data for all
Page 305 and 306: An n e x e sevolutionary ecological
Page 307 and 308: An n e x e sThe comparison of the t
Page 309 and 310: An n e x e sDefining and including
Page 311 and 312: An n e x e s“avoiding” acts (GD
Page 313 and 314: An n e x e sGautier JY, Deleporte P
Page 315 and 316: An n e x e sMcLennan DA, Brooks DR,
Page 317 and 318: An n e x e sWenzel JW. 1993. Applic
Page 319 and 320: An n e x e sTable 1: PCR primers na
Page 321 and 322: An n e x e sTable 4: Phylogenetic a
Page 323 and 324: An n e x e sPhortioeca nimbataP.n.
Page 325 and 326:
An n e x e sSchultesia lampyridifor
Page 327 and 328:
An n e x e sSpecies 1 = outgroupInd
Page 329:
An n e x e sAnalysis AEublaberus di
Page 332 and 333:
Page 334 and 335:
Page 336 and 337:
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342 and 343:
Page 344 and 345:
Page 346 and 347:
Page 348 and 349:
Page 350 and 351:
Page 352 and 353:
Page 354 and 355:
Page 356 and 357:
Page 358 and 359:
Page 360 and 361:
Page 362 and 363:
Page 364 and 365:
Page 366 and 367:
Page 368 and 369:
Page 370 and 371:
Page 372 and 373:
Page 374 and 375:
Page 376 and 377:
Page 378 and 379:
Page 380 and 381:
Page 382 and 383:
igureEv o l u t i o n d u c o m p o
Page 384 and 385:
FigureEv o l u t i o n d u c o m p
Page 386 and 387:
Figure Ev o l u t i o n d u c o m p
Page 388 and 389:
FigureEv o l u t i o n d u c o m p
Page 390 and 391:
Page 392 and 393:
ablesEvo l u t i o n d u c o m p o
Page 395 and 396:
ANNEXE VICom m a n d e s de s an a
Page 397:
An n e x e sCommandes relatives à
Page 400 and 401:
Page 402 and 403:
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
Page 408 and 409:
Page 410 and 411:
Page 412 and 413:
Page 415 and 416:
ANNEXE XIICur r i c u l u m Vi t a
Page 417 and 418:
An n e x e s
Page 419 and 420:
An n e x e s
Page 421 and 422:
Ré s u m éPh y l o g é n i e e t
show all

PhylogÃ©nie Et Evolution Du Comportement Social Chez Les Blattes ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?