PhylogÃ©nie Et Evolution Du Comportement Social Chez Les Blattes ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Ev o l u t i o n d u c o m p o r t e m e n t s o c i a l262Holmgren, N. 1909. Termitenstudien I. Anatomische Untersuchungen. Kungliga SvenskaVetenskapsakademiens Handlingar 44:1-215.Holmgren, N. 1911. Termitenstudien II. Systematik der Termiten. Die Familien Mastotermitidae,Protermitidae und Mesotermitidae. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar46:1-88.Holmgren, N. 1912. Termitenstudien III. Systematik der Termiten. Die Familien Metatermitidae.Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar 48:1-166.Huelsenbeck, J. P., B. Larget et D. Swofford. 2000. A compound poisson process for relaxing themolecular clock. Genetics 154:1879-1892.Huelsenbeck, J. P. et F. Ronquist. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees.Bioinformatics 17:754-755.Imms, A. D. 1919. On the structure and biology of Archotermopsis, together with description of newspecies of intestinal Protozoa, and general observations on the Isoptera. Phil. Trans. R. Soc.Lond. B 209:75-180.Inward, D., G. Beccaloni et P. Eggleton. 2007a. Death of an order: a comprehensive molecularphylogenetic study confirms that termites are eusocial cockroaches. Biology Letters 3:331-335.Inward, D., A. P. Vogler et P. Eggleton. 2007b. A comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of termites(Isoptera) illluminates key aspects of their evolutionary biology. Molecular Phylogenetics andEvolution 44:953-967.Jablonski, D. 1997. Body-size evolution in Cretaceous molluscs and the status of Cope’s rule. Nature385:250-252.Jacob, F. 1977. Evolution and tinkering. Science 196:1161-1166.Jeanson, R., C. Rivault, J.-L. Deneubourg, S. Blanco, R. Fournier, C. Jost et G. Theraulaz. 2005. Selforganizedaggregation in cockroaches. Animal Behaviour 69:169-180.Jeffery, J. E., M. K. Richardson, M. I. Coates et O. R. P. Bininda-Edmonds. 2002. Analysingdevelopmental sequences within a phylogenetic framework. Systematic Biology 51:478-491.Jeffery, J. E., O. R. P. Bininda-Edmonds, M. I. Coates et M. K. Richardson. 2005. A new techniquefor identifying sequence heterochrony. Systematic Biology 54:230-240.Judd, T. M. 1998. Defensive behavior of colonies of the paper wasp, Polistes fuscatus, against vertebratepredators over the colony cycle. Insectes sociaux 45:197-208.Kambhampati, S. 1996. Phylogenetic relationship among cockroach families inferred frommitochondrial 12S rRNA gene sequence. Systematic Entomology 21:89-98.Kambhampati, S., K. M. Kjer et B. L. Thorne. 1996. Phylogenetic relationship among termite familiesbased on DNA sequence of mitochondrial 16S ribosomal RNA gene. Insect Molecular Biology5:229-238.Kambhampati, S. et P. Eggleton. 2000. Taxonomy and phylogeny of termites. Pages 1-23 in Termites:Evolution, Sociality, Symbioses, Ecology. (T. Abe, D. E. Bignell et M. Higashi, eds.) KluwerAcademic, Dordrecht.Kelley, S. T. et B. D. Farrell. 1998. Is specialization a dead end? The phylogeny of host use in Dendroctonusbark beetles (Scolytidae). Evolution 52:1731-1743.Kendall, M. G. et B. Babington-Smith. 1939. The problem of m rankings. Ann. Math. Statist. 10:275-287.Kennedy, M., H. G. Spencer et R. D. Gray. 1996. Hop, step and gape: do the social displays of thePelecaniformes reflect phylogeny? Animal Behaviour 51:273-291.Kent, D. S. et J. A. Simpson. 1992. Eusociality in the beetle Austroplatypus incompertus (Coleoptera:Curculionidae). Naturwissenschaften 79:86-87.Kerr, B. et P. Godfrey-Smith. 2002. Individualist and multi-level perspectives on selection in structuredpopulations. Biology and Philosophy 17:477-517.King, J. A. 1973. The ecology of aggressive behavior. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4:117-138.Kjer, K. M. 2004. Aligned 18S and insect phylogeny. Systematic Biology 53:506-514.Kjer, K. M., F. L. Carle, J. Litman et J. Ware. 2006. A molecular phylogeny of Hexapoda. ArthropodSystematics & Phylogeny 64:35-44.Klass, K. D. 1997. The external male genitalia and the phylogeny of Blattaria and Mantodea. Pages1-341 in Bonner Zoologische Monographien.
Ré f é r e n c e s b i b l i o g r a p h i q u e sKlass, K. D. et R. Meier. 2006. A phylogenetic analysis of Dictyoptera (Insecta) based on morphologicalcharacters. Entomologische Abhandlungen 63:3-50.Kluge, A. G. et J. S. Farris. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. SystematicZoology 30:1-32.Koehler, P. G., H. R. Agee, N. C. Leppla et R. S. Patterson. 1987. Spectral sensitivity and behavioralresponse to light quality in the german cockroach (Dictyoptera: Blattellidae). Ann. Entomol.Soc. Am. 80:820-822.Korb, J. et M. Lenz. 2004. Reproductive decision-making in the termite, Cryptotermes secundus(Kalotermitidae), under variable food conditions. Behavioral Ecology 15:390-395.Krishna, K. 1970. Taxonomy, phylogeny, and distribution of termites in Biology of termites. pp 127-152. (K. Krishna et F. M. Weesner, eds.) Academic Press, N-Y.Krishna, K. et F. M. Weesner. 1969. Biology of termites. Vol. I. Academic Press, N. Y.Krishna, K. et F. M. Weesner. 1970. Biology of termites. Vol. II. Academic Press, N. Y.Krishna, K. et D. Grimaldi. 2003. The first Cretaceous Rhinotermitidae (Isoptera): a new species,genus, and subfamily in Burmese Amber. American Museum Novitates 3390:1-10.Kristensen, N. P. 1981. Phylogeny of Insect orders. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 26:135-157.Kristensen, N. P. 1981. Phylogeny of Insect orders. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 26:135-157.Kristensen, N. P. 1995. Fourty [sic] years’insect phylogenetic systematics. Zoologische Beiträge NeueFolge 36:83-124.Lainé, L. V. et D. J. Wright. 2003. The life cycle of Reticulitermes spp. (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae):what do we know? Bulletin of Entomological Research 93:267-278.Legendre, F., T. Robillard, L. Desutter-Grandcolas, M. F. Whiting et P. Grandcolas. accepté.Phylogenetic analysis of non-stereotyped behavioural sequences with a successive eventpairingmethod. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society.Legendre, F., R. Pellens et P. Grandcolas. soumis-a. A Comparison of Behavioral Interactions inSolitary and Presocial Zetoborinae Cockroaches (Blattaria, Blaberidae). Journal of InsectBehaviour.Legendre, F., M. F. Whiting, C. Bordereau, E. M. Cancello, T. A. Evans et P. Grandcolas. soumis-b.The phylogeny of termites (Dictyoptera: Isoptera) based on mitochondrial and nuclear markers:implications for the evolution of the worker and pseudergate castes, and foraging behaviors.Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.Lehmann, L. et L. Keller. 2006. The evolution of cooperation and altruism - a general framework anda classification of models. Journal of evolutionary biology 19:1365-1376.Liao, D. 1999. Concerted evolution: molecular mechanism and biological implications. Am. J. Hum.Genet. 64:24-30.Lo, N., G. Tokuda, H. Watanabe, H. Rose, M. Slaytor, K. Maekawa, C. Bandi et H. Noda. 2000.Evidence from multiple gene sequences indicated that termites evolved from wood-feedingcockroaches. Current Biology 10:801-804.Lo, N., O. Kitade, T. Miura, R. Constantino et T. Matsumoto. 2004. Molecular phylogeny of theRhinotermitidae. Insectes sociaux 51:365-371.Lopez, P., D. Casane et H. Philippe. 2002. Heterotachy, an important process of protein evolution.Molecular Biology and Evolution 19:1-7.Lorenz, K. 1941. Comparative studies on the behaviour of Anatinae, Avicultural Magazine.Lorenz, K. 1978. Les fondements de l’éthologie, Champs Flammarion Sciences (traduction française);426 pp.Lusseau, D. 2003. The emergence of cetaceans: phylogenetic analysis of male social behaviour supportsthe Cetartiodactyla clade. Journal of evolutionary biology 16:531-535.Mabee, P. M. et T. A. Trendler. 1996. Development of the cranium and paired fins in Betta splendens(Teleostei: Percomorpha): intraspecific variation and interspecific comparisons. Journal ofMorphology 227:249-287.Macedonia, J. M. et K. F. Stanger. 1994. Phylogeny of the Lemuridae revisited: evidence fromcommunication signals. Folia Primatol. 63:1-43.Maekawa, K., N. Lo, H. Rose et T. Matsumoto. 2003. The evolution of soil-burrowing cockroaches(Blattaria: Blaberidae) from wood-burrowing ancestors following an invasion of the latter fromAsia into Australia. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270:1301-1307.263
Page 1:
UFR des Sciences de la VieEcole Doc
Page 4 and 5:
Je remercie toutes les personnes av
Page 7 and 8:
Ta b l e d e s Mat i è r e sRe m e
Page 9 and 10:
Données moléculaires sans les sé
Page 11:
Ch a p i t r e V : Di s c u s s i o
Page 14 and 15:
Figure 3.10 : Analyse cladistique d
Page 17 and 18:
Li s t e d e s Ta b l e au xTableau
Page 19:
In t r o d u c t i o nNothing in bi
Page 22 and 23:
Ev o l u t i o n d u c o m p o r t
Page 24 and 25:
Page 27 and 28:
I. An a ly s e d u c o n t e x t e
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 61 and 62:
II. Mat é r i e l s e t m é t h o
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65:
ABCDEGHFJIK
Page 68 and 69:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111:
Page 115 and 116:
III. Réversibilité, c o n t r a i
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187:
CHAPITRE IVEv o l u t i o n d e s c
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231: Ev o l u t i o n d u c o m p o r t
Page 259 and 260: V. Dis c u s s ion g é n é r a l
Page 271: V. Dis c u s s ion g é n é r a l
Page 274 and 275: Ré f é r e n c e s b i b l i o g
Page 291 and 292: ANNEXE IDéf i n i t i o n s deq u
Page 293 and 294: ANNEXE IIPr o t o c o l e d’ex t
Page 295 and 296: ANNEXE IIILeg e n d r e et al . (Bi
Page 297 and 298: An n e x e sAbstractA new method is
Page 299 and 300: An n e x e sexpressed in such non-s
Page 301 and 302: An n e x e sanother species would a
Page 303 and 304: An n e x e sMolecular data for all
Page 305 and 306: An n e x e sevolutionary ecological
Page 307 and 308: An n e x e sThe comparison of the t
Page 309 and 310: An n e x e sDefining and including
Page 311 and 312: An n e x e s“avoiding” acts (GD
Page 313 and 314: An n e x e sGautier JY, Deleporte P
Page 315 and 316: An n e x e sMcLennan DA, Brooks DR,
Page 317 and 318: An n e x e sWenzel JW. 1993. Applic
Page 319 and 320: An n e x e sTable 1: PCR primers na
Page 321 and 322: An n e x e sTable 4: Phylogenetic a
Page 323 and 324: An n e x e sPhortioeca nimbataP.n.
Page 325 and 326: An n e x e sSchultesia lampyridifor
Page 327 and 328: An n e x e sSpecies 1 = outgroupInd
Page 329: An n e x e sAnalysis AEublaberus di
Page 332 and 333:
Page 334 and 335:
Page 336 and 337:
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342 and 343:
Page 344 and 345:
Page 346 and 347:
Page 348 and 349:
Page 350 and 351:
Page 352 and 353:
Page 354 and 355:
Page 356 and 357:
Page 358 and 359:
Page 360 and 361:
Page 362 and 363:
Page 364 and 365:
Page 366 and 367:
Page 368 and 369:
Page 370 and 371:
Page 372 and 373:
Page 374 and 375:
Page 376 and 377:
Page 378 and 379:
Page 380 and 381:
Page 382 and 383:
igureEv o l u t i o n d u c o m p o
Page 384 and 385:
FigureEv o l u t i o n d u c o m p
Page 386 and 387:
Figure Ev o l u t i o n d u c o m p
Page 388 and 389:
FigureEv o l u t i o n d u c o m p
Page 390 and 391:
Page 392 and 393:
ablesEvo l u t i o n d u c o m p o
Page 395 and 396:
ANNEXE VICom m a n d e s de s an a
Page 397:
An n e x e sCommandes relatives à
Page 400 and 401:
Page 402 and 403:
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
Page 408 and 409:
Page 410 and 411:
Page 412 and 413:
Page 415 and 416:
ANNEXE XIICur r i c u l u m Vi t a
Page 417 and 418:
An n e x e s
Page 419 and 420:
An n e x e s
Page 421 and 422:
Ré s u m éPh y l o g é n i e e t
show all

PhylogÃ©nie Et Evolution Du Comportement Social Chez Les Blattes ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?