PhylogÃ©nie Et Evolution Du Comportement Social Chez Les Blattes ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Ev o l u t i o n d u c o m p o r t e m e n t s o c i a l264Magnusson, M. S. 2000. Discovering hidden time patternsin behavior: t-patterns and their detection.Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 32:93-110.Mahner, M. et M. A. Bunge. 1997. Foundations of Biophilosophy, Springer.Martin, P. et P. Bateson. 1986. Measuring behaviour: an introductory guide, second edition, CambridgeUniversity Press.Martins Neto, R. G. et M. Pesenti. 2006. The first fossil Termitidae (Isoptera) from the Oligocene ofSouth America: the Entre-Córregos formation of the Aiuruoca basin, Minas Gerais, Brazil.Journal of the Entomological Research Society 8:63-68.Maynard-Smith, J. 1982. Evolution and the theory of games, Cambridge University Press.Maynard-Smith, J. 1985. Developmental constraints and evolution: a pespective from the MountainLake Conference on development and evolution. Quarterly Review of Biology 60:265-287.Maynard-Smith, J. et E. Szathmary. 1995. The major transitions in evolution, Oxford UniversityPress.McFarland, D. 1993. Animal Behaviour, Longman, Harlow.McKittrick, F. A. 1964. Evolutionary study of cockroaches. Cornell Univ. Agric. Exp. Stat. Mem.389:1-197.McLennan, D. A., D. R. Brooks et J. D. McPhail. 1988. The benefits of communication betweencomparative ethology and phylogenetic systematics: a case study studying gasterosteid fishes.Can. J. Zool. 66:2177-2190.McLennan, D. A. et M. Y. Mattern. 2001. The phylogeny of the Gasterosteidae: combining behavioraland morphological data sets. Cladistics 17:11-27.McShea, D. W. 1994. Mechanisms of large-scale evolutionary trends. Evolution 48:1747-1763.Mensa-Bonsu, A. 1976. The biology and development of Porotermes adamsoni (Froggatt) (Isoptera,Hodotermitidae). Insectes sociaux 23:155-165.Michener, C. D. 1969. Comparative social behavior of bees. Annual Review of Entomology 14:299-342.Miller, E. M. 1942. The problem of castes and caste differentiation in Prorhinotermes simplex (Hagen).Bull. Univ. Miami 15:1-27.Minitab, I. 1996. MINITAB Statistical Package. Release 14. Minitab Inc., State College, Pennsylvania,U.S.A.Miura, T., K. Maekawa, O. Kitade, T. Abe et T. Matsumoto. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships amongsubfamilies in higher termites (Isoptera: Termitidae) based on mitochondrial COII genesequences. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 91:515-523.Morgan, F. D. 1959. The ecology and external morphology of Stolotermes ruficeps Brauer. Trans. R.Soc., New Zealand 86:155-195.Moritz, R. F. A. 1989. Colony level and within colony level selection in honeybees. Behav. Ecol.Sociobiol. 25:437-444.Murienne, J., P. Grandcolas, M. D. Piulachs, X. Bellés, C. D’Haese, F. Legendre, R. Pellens et E.Guilbert. 2005. Evolution on a shaky piece of Gondwana: is local endemism recent in NewCaledonia? Cladistics 21:2-7.Myles, T. G. 1986. Reproductive soldiers in the Termopsidae (Isoptera). Pan-Pacific Entomologist62:293-299.Myles, T. G. 1988. Resource inheritance in social evolution from termites to man. Pages 379-423 in Theecology of social behavior (C. N. Slobodchikoff, ed.) Academic Press, San Diego, California.Myles, T. G. et W. L. Nutting. 1988. Termite eusocial evolution: a re-examination of Bartz’s hypothesisand assumptions. The Quaterly Review of Biology 63:1-23.Nagin, R. 1972. Caste determination in Neotermes jouteli (Banks). Insectes sociaux 19:39-61.Nalepa, C. A. 1984. Colony composition, protozoan transfer and some life history characteristics ofthe woodroach Cryptocercus punctulatus Scudder (Dictyoptera : Cryptocercidae). Behav. Ecol.Sociobiol. 14:273-279.Nalepa, C. A. 1988. Cost of parental care in the woodroach Cryptocercus punctulatus Scudder(Dictyoptera : Cryptocercidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 23:135-140.Nalepa, C. A. 1990. Early development of nymphs and establishment of hindgut symbiosis inCryptocercus punctulatus (Dictyoptera, Cryptocercidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 83:786-789.
Ré f é r e n c e s b i b l i o g r a p h i q u e sNalepa, C. A. 1994. Nourishment and the origin of termite eusociality. Pages 57-104 in Nourishmentand evolution in insect societies. (J. H. Hunt et C. A. Nalepa, eds.) Westview Press, Boulder,Colorado.Nalepa, C. A. et W. J. Bell. 1997. Post-ovulation parental investment and parental care in cockroaches.Pages 26-51 in The evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids (J. C. Choe et B. J.Crespi, eds.) Cambridge University Press.Nalepa, C. et M. Lenz. 2000. The ootheca of Mastotermes darwiniensis Froggatt (Isoptera:Mastotermitidae): homology with cockroach oothecae. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267:1809-1813.Nel, A. et J.-C. Paicheler. 1993. Les Isoptera fossiles. Etat actuel des connaissances, implicationspaléoécologiques et paléoclimatologiques. [Insecta, Dictyoptera]. Cahiers de paléontologie:102-179.Nel, A. et E. Bourguet. 2006. Termites of the early Eocene amber of France (Isoptera: Mastotermitidae,Kalotermitidae). Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und Palaontologie Monatshefte 2:101-115.Nelson, G. J. 1985. Outgroups and ontogeny. Cladistics 1:29-45.Nijhout, F. H. 1999. Control mechanisms of polyphenic development in Insects. BioScience 49:181-192.Nijhout, F. H. 2003. Development and evolution of adaptive polyphenisms. Evolution & development5:9-18.Nixon, K. C. et J. M. Carpenter. 1993. On outgroups. Cladistics 9:413-426.Nixon, K. C. 1999. The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics15:407-414.Nixon, K. C. 2001. Phylogeny. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity 4:559-568.Nixon, K. C. 2002. Winclada version 1.00.08. published by the author.:Ithaca, NY.Noirot, C. 1955. Recherches sur le polymorphisme des termites supérieurs. Annales des SciencesNaturelles, Zoologie. 11ème série:399-595.Noirot, C. 1985a. The caste system in higher termites in Caste differentiation in social insects. (J. A. L.Watson, B. M. Okot-Kotber et C. Noirot, eds.) Pergamon, Oxford.Noirot, C. 1985b. Pathways of caste development in the lower termites in Caste differentiation in socialinsects. (J. A. L. Watson, B. M. Okot-Kotber et C. Noirot, eds.) Pergamon, Oxford.Noirot, C. et J. M. Pasteels. 1987. Ontogenetic development and evolution of the worker caste intermites. Experientia 43:851-952.Noirot, C. et J. M. Pasteels. 1988. The worker caste is polyphyletic in termites. Sociobiology 14:15-20.Noirot, C. 1992. From wood- to humus-feeding: an important trend in termite evolution. Pages 107-119 in Biology and evolution of social insects. (J. Billen, ed.) Leuven.Noirot, C. 2001. The gut of termites (Isoptera) comparative anatomy, systematics, phylogeny. II. -Higher termites (Termitidae). Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. (N.S.) 37:431-471.Noll, F. B. 2002. Behavioral phylogeny of corbiculate Apidae (Hymenoptera; Apinae), with specialreference to social behavior. Cladistics 18:137-153.Noll, F. B., J. W. Wenzel et R. Zucchi. 2004. Evolution of caste in neotropical swarm-founding wasps(Hymenoptera: Vespidae; Epiponini). American Museum Novitates 3467: 1-24.Nosil, P. et A. O. Mooers. 2005. Testing hypotheses about ecological specialization using phylogenetictrees. Evolution 59:2256-2263.O’Hara, R. J. 1992. Telling the tree: narrative representation and the study of evolutionary history.Biology and Philosophy 7:135-160.Okasha, S. 2003. Recent work on the levels of selection problem. Human Nature Review 3:349-356.Okasha, S. 2004. Multilevel selection and the partitioning of covariance: a comparison of threeapproaches. Evolution 58:486-494.Okasha, S. 2006. The levels of selection debate: philosophical issues. Philosophy Compass 1:74-85.Ord, T. J. et D. T. Blumstein. 2002. Size constraints and the evolution of displays complexity: why dolarge lizards have simple displays? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 76:145-161.Osborne, K. A., A. Robichon, E. Burgess, S. Butland, R. A. Shaw, A. Coulthard, H. S. Pereira, R.J. Greenspan et M. B. Sokolowski. 1997. Natural behavior polymorphism due to a cGMPdependentprotein kinase of Drosophila. Science 277:834-836.265
Page 1:
UFR des Sciences de la VieEcole Doc
Page 4 and 5:
Je remercie toutes les personnes av
Page 7 and 8:
Ta b l e d e s Mat i è r e sRe m e
Page 9 and 10:
Données moléculaires sans les sé
Page 11:
Ch a p i t r e V : Di s c u s s i o
Page 14 and 15:
Figure 3.10 : Analyse cladistique d
Page 17 and 18:
Li s t e d e s Ta b l e au xTableau
Page 19:
In t r o d u c t i o nNothing in bi
Page 22 and 23:
Ev o l u t i o n d u c o m p o r t
Page 24 and 25:
Page 27 and 28:
I. An a ly s e d u c o n t e x t e
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 61 and 62:
II. Mat é r i e l s e t m é t h o
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65:
ABCDEGHFJIK
Page 68 and 69:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111:
Page 115 and 116:
III. Réversibilité, c o n t r a i
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187:
CHAPITRE IVEv o l u t i o n d e s c
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233: Ev o l u t i o n d u c o m p o r t
Page 259 and 260: V. Dis c u s s ion g é n é r a l
Page 271: V. Dis c u s s ion g é n é r a l
Page 274 and 275: Ré f é r e n c e s b i b l i o g
Page 291 and 292: ANNEXE IDéf i n i t i o n s deq u
Page 293 and 294: ANNEXE IIPr o t o c o l e d’ex t
Page 295 and 296: ANNEXE IIILeg e n d r e et al . (Bi
Page 297 and 298: An n e x e sAbstractA new method is
Page 299 and 300: An n e x e sexpressed in such non-s
Page 301 and 302: An n e x e sanother species would a
Page 303 and 304: An n e x e sMolecular data for all
Page 305 and 306: An n e x e sevolutionary ecological
Page 307 and 308: An n e x e sThe comparison of the t
Page 309 and 310: An n e x e sDefining and including
Page 311 and 312: An n e x e s“avoiding” acts (GD
Page 313 and 314: An n e x e sGautier JY, Deleporte P
Page 315 and 316: An n e x e sMcLennan DA, Brooks DR,
Page 317 and 318: An n e x e sWenzel JW. 1993. Applic
Page 319 and 320: An n e x e sTable 1: PCR primers na
Page 321 and 322: An n e x e sTable 4: Phylogenetic a
Page 323 and 324: An n e x e sPhortioeca nimbataP.n.
Page 325 and 326: An n e x e sSchultesia lampyridifor
Page 327 and 328: An n e x e sSpecies 1 = outgroupInd
Page 329: An n e x e sAnalysis AEublaberus di
Page 332 and 333:
Page 334 and 335:
Page 336 and 337:
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342 and 343:
Page 344 and 345:
Page 346 and 347:
Page 348 and 349:
Page 350 and 351:
Page 352 and 353:
Page 354 and 355:
Page 356 and 357:
Page 358 and 359:
Page 360 and 361:
Page 362 and 363:
Page 364 and 365:
Page 366 and 367:
Page 368 and 369:
Page 370 and 371:
Page 372 and 373:
Page 374 and 375:
Page 376 and 377:
Page 378 and 379:
Page 380 and 381:
Page 382 and 383:
igureEv o l u t i o n d u c o m p o
Page 384 and 385:
FigureEv o l u t i o n d u c o m p
Page 386 and 387:
Figure Ev o l u t i o n d u c o m p
Page 388 and 389:
FigureEv o l u t i o n d u c o m p
Page 390 and 391:
Page 392 and 393:
ablesEvo l u t i o n d u c o m p o
Page 395 and 396:
ANNEXE VICom m a n d e s de s an a
Page 397:
An n e x e sCommandes relatives à
Page 400 and 401:
Page 402 and 403:
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
Page 408 and 409:
Page 410 and 411:
Page 412 and 413:
Page 415 and 416:
ANNEXE XIICur r i c u l u m Vi t a
Page 417 and 418:
An n e x e s
Page 419 and 420:
An n e x e s
Page 421 and 422:
Ré s u m éPh y l o g é n i e e t
show all

PhylogÃ©nie Et Evolution Du Comportement Social Chez Les Blattes ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?