PhylogÃ©nie Et Evolution Du Comportement Social Chez Les Blattes ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Ev o l u t i o n d u c o m p o r t e m e n t s o c i a lHillis DM, Dixon MT. 1991. Ribosomal DNA: molecular evolution and phylogeneticinference. Quarterly Review of Biology 66: 411-453.Hillis DM, Huelsenbeck JP. 1992. Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogeneticanalyses. Journal of Heredity 83: 189-195.Hinde RA. 1955. A comparative study of the courtship of certain finches. Ibis 97: 706-745.Hinde RA, Tinbergen N. 1958. The comparative study of species-specific behavior. In: RoeA, Simpson GG, eds. Behavior and evolution. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale UniversityPress. 251-268.Hodos W. 1976. The concept of homology and the evolution of behavior. In: MastertonRB, Hodos W, Jerison H, eds. Evolution, Brain, and Behavior: Persistent problems.Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. 153-167.Jarvis KJ, Haas F, Whiting MF. 2004. Phylogeny of earwigs (Insecta: Dermaptera) based onmolecular and morphological evidence: reconsidering the classification of Dermaptera.Systematic Entomology 29: 359-370.Jeffery JE, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Coates MI, Richardson MK. 2005. A New Techniquefor Identifying Sequence Heterochrony. Systematic Biology 54: 230-240.Johnson KP, McKinney F, Wilson R, Sorenson MD. 2000. The evolution of postcopulatorydisplays in dabbling ducks (Anatini): a phylogenetic perspective. Animal Behaviour 59:953-963.Kambhampati S. 1995. A phylogeny of cockroaches and related insects based on DNAsequence of mitochondrial ribosomal RNA genes. Proceedings of the National Academyof Sciences of the USA 92: 2017-2020.Kennedy M, Spencer HG, Gray RD. 1996. Hop, step and gape: do the social displays of thePelecaniformes reflect phylogeny? Animal Behaviour 51: 273-291.Lauder GV. 1986. Homology, analogy, and the evolution of behavior. In: Nitecki MH,Kitchell JA, eds. Evolution of animal behavior: paleontological and field approaches.New York: Oxford University Press. 9-40.Lorenz K. 1941. Vergleichende Bewegungsstudien an Anatinen. Journal of Ornithology 89:194-294.Mabee PM, Trendler TA. 1996. Development of the cranium and paired fins in Bettasplendens: intraspecific variation and interspecific comparisons. Journal of Morphology227: 249-287.Macedonia JM, Stanger KF. 1994. Phylogeny of the Lemuridae revisited: evidence fromcommunication signals. Folia Primatologica 63: 1-43.Martin P, Bateson P. 1986. Measuring behaviour. An introductory guide. CambridgeUniversity Press, Cambridge.McFarland D. 1993. Animal Behaviour. Longman, Harlow.McLennan DA. 1991. Integrating phylogeny and experimental ethology: from pattern toprocess. Evolution 45: 1773-1789.296
An n e x e sMcLennan DA, Brooks DR, McPhail JD. 1988. The benefits of communication betweencomparative ethology and phylogenetic systematics: a case study using gasterosteidfishes. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66: 2177-2190.Nalepa CA, Bell WJ. 1997. Postovulation parental investment and parental care incockroaches. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ, eds. The evolution of social behavior in Insectsand Arachnids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 26-51.Nixon KC. 2002. Winclada version 1.00.08. published by the author. Trumansburg, NY.Noll FB. 2002. Behavioral Phylogeny of Corbiculate Apidae (Hymenoptera; Apinae), withSpecial Reference to Social Behavior. Cladistics 18: 137-153.Page RDM. 1992. COMPONENT User Manual (Release 2.0). London: Natural HistoryMuseum.Pellens R, Legendre F, Grandcolas P. 2007a. Phylogenetic analysis of social behaviourevolution in [Zetoborinae + Blaberinae + Gyninae + Diplopterinae] cockroaches:an update with the study of endemic radiations from the Atlantic forest. Studies onNeotropical Fauna and Environment: 42: 25-31.Pellens R, D’Haese C, Bellés X, Piulachs MD, Wheeler W, and Grandcolas P. 2007b.The evolutionary transition from subsocial to eusocial behavior: phylogenetic andecological evidence for modification of the “shift-in-dependent-care” hypothesis witha new prototermite model. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution: in press.Price JJ, Lanyon SM. 2002. Reconstructing the evolution of complex bird song in theOropendolas. Evolution 56: 1514-1529.Proctor HC. 1996. Behavioral characters and homoplasy: Perception versus practice. In:Sanderson MJ, Hufford L, eds. Homoplasy: The Recurrence of Similarity in Evolution.San Diego: Academic Press. 131-149.Rae TC. 1998. The Logical Basis for the use of Continuous Characters in PhylogeneticSystematics. Cladistics 14: 221-228.Robillard T, Höbel G, Gerhardt HC. 2006a. Evolution of advertisement signals in NorthAmerican hylid frogs: vocalizations as end-products of calling behavior. Cladistics 22:533-545.Robillard T, Legendre F, Desutter-Grandcolas L, Grandcolas P. 2006b. Phylogeneticanalysis and alignment of behavioral sequences by direct optimization. Cladistics 22:602-633.Roth LM. 1970. The male genitalia of Blattaria. III. Blaberidae: Zetoborinae. Psyche 77: 217-36.Schal C, Gautier JY, Bell WJ. 1984. Behavioural ecology of cockroaches. Biological Review59: 209-254.Schlich R. 2001. Analysing intrapersonal variability of travel behaviour using the sequencealignment method. European Transport Research Conference, September, 2001.Cambridge.297
Page 1:
UFR des Sciences de la VieEcole Doc
Page 4 and 5:
Je remercie toutes les personnes av
Page 7 and 8:
Ta b l e d e s Mat i è r e sRe m e
Page 9 and 10:
Données moléculaires sans les sé
Page 11:
Ch a p i t r e V : Di s c u s s i o
Page 14 and 15:
Figure 3.10 : Analyse cladistique d
Page 17 and 18:
Li s t e d e s Ta b l e au xTableau
Page 19:
In t r o d u c t i o nNothing in bi
Page 22 and 23:
Ev o l u t i o n d u c o m p o r t
Page 24 and 25:
Page 27 and 28:
I. An a ly s e d u c o n t e x t e
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 61 and 62:
II. Mat é r i e l s e t m é t h o
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65:
ABCDEGHFJIK
Page 68 and 69:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111:
Page 115 and 116:
III. Réversibilité, c o n t r a i
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187:
CHAPITRE IVEv o l u t i o n d e s c
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 259 and 260:
V. Dis c u s s ion g é n é r a l
Page 261 and 262:
V. Dis c u s s ion g é n é r a l
Page 263 and 264: V. Dis c u s s ion g é n é r a l
Page 271: V. Dis c u s s ion g é n é r a l
Page 274 and 275: Ré f é r e n c e s b i b l i o g
Page 276 and 277: Ev o l u t i o n d u c o m p o r t
Page 291 and 292: ANNEXE IDéf i n i t i o n s deq u
Page 293 and 294: ANNEXE IIPr o t o c o l e d’ex t
Page 295 and 296: ANNEXE IIILeg e n d r e et al . (Bi
Page 297 and 298: An n e x e sAbstractA new method is
Page 299 and 300: An n e x e sexpressed in such non-s
Page 301 and 302: An n e x e sanother species would a
Page 303 and 304: An n e x e sMolecular data for all
Page 305 and 306: An n e x e sevolutionary ecological
Page 307 and 308: An n e x e sThe comparison of the t
Page 309 and 310: An n e x e sDefining and including
Page 311 and 312: An n e x e s“avoiding” acts (GD
Page 313: An n e x e sGautier JY, Deleporte P
Page 317 and 318: An n e x e sWenzel JW. 1993. Applic
Page 319 and 320: An n e x e sTable 1: PCR primers na
Page 321 and 322: An n e x e sTable 4: Phylogenetic a
Page 323 and 324: An n e x e sPhortioeca nimbataP.n.
Page 325 and 326: An n e x e sSchultesia lampyridifor
Page 327 and 328: An n e x e sSpecies 1 = outgroupInd
Page 329: An n e x e sAnalysis AEublaberus di
Page 364 and 365:
Page 366 and 367:
Page 368 and 369:
Page 370 and 371:
Page 372 and 373:
Page 374 and 375:
Page 376 and 377:
Page 378 and 379:
Page 380 and 381:
Page 382 and 383:
igureEv o l u t i o n d u c o m p o
Page 384 and 385:
FigureEv o l u t i o n d u c o m p
Page 386 and 387:
Figure Ev o l u t i o n d u c o m p
Page 388 and 389:
FigureEv o l u t i o n d u c o m p
Page 390 and 391:
Page 392 and 393:
ablesEvo l u t i o n d u c o m p o
Page 395 and 396:
ANNEXE VICom m a n d e s de s an a
Page 397:
An n e x e sCommandes relatives à
Page 400 and 401:
Page 402 and 403:
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
Page 408 and 409:
Page 410 and 411:
Page 412 and 413:
Page 415 and 416:
ANNEXE XIICur r i c u l u m Vi t a
Page 417 and 418:
An n e x e s
Page 419 and 420:
An n e x e s
Page 421 and 422:
Ré s u m éPh y l o g é n i e e t
show all

PhylogÃ©nie Et Evolution Du Comportement Social Chez Les Blattes ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?