PhylogÃ©nie Et Evolution Du Comportement Social Chez Les Blattes ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Ev o l u t i o n d u c o m p o r t e m e n t s o c i a l258Cuénot, L. 1909. Le peuplement des places vides dans la nature et l’origine des adaptations. Revuegénérale des Sciences 20:8-14.Cuénot, L. 1914. Théorie de la préadaptation. Scientia 16:60-73.D’Haese, C. 2000. Is Psammophily an Evolutionary Dead End? A Phylogenetic Test in the GenusWillemia (Collembola: Hypogastruridae). Cladistics 16:255-273.Dac, P. 1981. L’os à Moelle, Jacques Pessis edition, Vol. 4, Almanach.Darling, F. F. 1938. Bird flocks and the breeding cycle: a contribution to the study of avian sociality,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Darlu, P. et P. Tassy. 1993. La reconstruction phylogénétique. Concepts et méthodes. Editions Masson,Paris.Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or Preservation of FavoredRaces in the Struggle for Life, London: Murray.Darwin, C. R. 1872. The expression of the emotions in man and animals, London: John Murray.Dawkins, R. 2003. Le Gène égoïste, Odile Jacob, Paris (traduction de l’ouvrage de 1976).De Pinna, M. C. C. 1991. Concepts and tests of homolgy in the cladistic paradigm. Cladistics 7:367-394.de Queiroz, A. et P. H. Wimberger. 1993. The usefulness of behavior for phylogeny estimation: levelsof homoplasy in behavioral and morphological characters. Evolution 47:46-60.de Waal, F. B. M. 1991. Complementary methods and convergence evidence in the study of primatesocial cognition. Behaviour 118:297-320.Deitz, L. L., C. Nalepa et K. D. Klass. 2003. Phylogeny of the Dictyoptera re-examined (Insecta).Entomologische Abhandlungen 61:69-91.Desutter-Grandcolas, L. 1993. The cricket fauna of Chiapanecan caves (Mexico): systematics,phylogeny and the evolution of troglobitic life (Orthoptera, Grylloidea, Phalangopsidae,Luzarinae). International Journal of Speleology 22:1-82.Desutter-Grandcolas, L. et T. Robillard. 2003. Phylogeny and the evolution of calling songs in Gryllus(Insecta, Orthoptera, Gryllidae). Zoologica Scripta 32:173-183.Desutter-Grandcolas, L., F. Legendre, P. Grandcolas, T. Robillard et J. Murienne. 2005. Convergenceand parallelism: is a new life ahead of old concepts? Cladistics 21:51-61.Desutter-Grandcolas, L., F. Legendre, P. Grandcolas, T. Robillard et J. Murienne. 2007.Distinguishing between convergence and parallelism is central to comparative biology: a replyto Williams and Ebach. Cladistics 23:90-94.Dewsbury, D. A. 1989. Comparative psychology, ethology, and animal behavior. Ann. Rev. Psychol.40:581-602.Dollo, L. 1893. Les lois de l’évolution. Bull. Soc. belge Géol. Pal. Hydr. 7:164-166.Dollo, L. 1922. Les Céphalopodes déroulés et l’irréversibilité de l’évolution. Bijdragen tot deDierkunde:215-227.Donovan, S. E., D. T. Jones, W. A. Sands et P. Eggleton. 2000. Morphological phylogenetics of termites(Isoptera). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 70:467-513.Douzery, E. J. P. 2002. Les datations en phylogénie moléculaire : de l’ADN et des protéines jusqu’auxfossiles et réciproquement. Dossier d’Habilitation à Diriger les Recherches. Université deMontpellier II.Duffy, J. E. 1996. Eusociality in a coral-reef shrimp. Nature 381:512-514.Duffy, J. E. 2002. The ecology and evolution of eusociality in sponge-dwelling shrimp. Pages 1-38 inGenes, Behavior, and Evolution in Social Insects (T. Kikuchi, ed.) University of HokkaidoPress, Sapporo, Japan.Dunn, O. J. 1964. Multiple contrasts using rank sums. Technometrics 6:241-252.Edgar, R. C. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput.Nucleic Acids Research 32:1792-1797.Eggleton, P. 2001. Termites and trees: a review of recent advances in termite phylogenetics. Insectessociaux 48:187-193.Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. 1970. Ethology, the biology of behavior, Holt, Rinehart and Winston. New York.Eickwort, G. C. 1981. Presocial Insects in Social Insects, Vol. II.:199-280.Eldredge, N. et J. Cracraft. 1980. Phylogenetic patterns and the evolutionary process: method andtheory in comparative biology, Columbia University Press.
Ré f é r e n c e s b i b l i o g r a p h i q u e sElzinga, C. H. 2003. Sequence similarity: a nonaligning technique. Sociological methods & research32:3-29.Emerson, A. E. 1955. Geographical origins and dispersions of termite genera. Feldiana (Zoology)37:465-521.Emerson, A. E. 1965. A review of the Mastotermitidae (Isoptera), including a new fossil genus fromBrazil. American Museum Novitates 2236:1-46.Emerson, A. E. et K. Krishna. 1975. The termite family Serritermitidae (Isoptera). American MuseumNovitates 2570:1-31.Engel, M. S. et K. Krishna. 2004. Family-group names for termites (Isoptera). American MuseumNovitates 3432:1-9.Evans, T. A. 1998. Factors influencing the evolution of social behaviour in Australian crab spiders(Araneae: Thomisidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 63:205-219.Evans, T. A., J. C. S. Lai, E. Toledano, L. McDowall, S. Rakotonarivo et M. Lenz. 2005. Termitesassess wood size by using vibration signals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 102:3732-3737.Faith, D. P. et P. S. Cranston. 1991. Could a cladogram this short have arisen by chance alone? Onpermutation tests for cladistic structure. Cladistics 7:1-28.Farris, J. S. 1970. Methods for computing Wagner trees. Systematic Zoology 19:83-92.Farris, J. S. 1979. The information content of the phylogenetic system. Systematic Zoology 28:483-519.Farris, J. S. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5:417-419.Farris, J. S., V. A. Albert, M. Källersjö, D. Lipscomb et A. G. Kluge. 1996. Parsimony jackknifingoutperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics 12:99-124.Felsenstein, J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading.Systematic Zoology 27:401-410.Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies : an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution39:783-791.Forbes, S. H., R. M. M. Adam, C. Bitney et P. F. Kukuk. 2002. Extended parental care in communalsocial groups. Journal of Insect Science 2:1-6.Forey, P. L., C. J. Humphries, I. L. Kitching, R. W. Scotland, D. J. Siebert et D. M. Williams. 1992.Cladistics a practical course in systematics, Oxford Science Publications.Furey, R. E. 1998. Two cooperatively social populations of the theridiid spider Anelosimus studiosus ina temperate region. Animal Behaviour 55:727-735.Futuyma, D. J. 1998. Evolutionary Biology, 3 rd ed. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.Gadagkar, R. 1994. Why the definition of eusociality is not helpful to understand its evolution andwhat should we do about it. Oikos 70:485-488.Gautier, J. Y. 1974. Processus de différenciation de l’organisation sociale chez quelques espècesde blattes du genre Blaberus : aspects écologiques et éthologiques. Thèse de Docteur d’Etat.Université de Rennes.Gautier, J. Y. et M. Forasté. 1982. Etude comparée des relations interindividuelles chez les mâles dedeux espèces de blattes, Blaberus craniifer Burm., et Eublaberus distanti Kirby. Phénomène dedominance et plasticité de l’organisation sociale. Biology of Behaviour 7:69-87.Gautier, J. Y., P. Deleporte et C. Rivault. 1988. Relationships between ecology and social behaviorin cockroaches. Pages 335-351 in The ecology of social behavior (C. N. Slobodchikoff, ed.)Academic Press, San Diego.Gäde, G., P. Grandcolas et R. Kellner. 1997. Structural data on hypertrehalosaemic neuropeptidesfrom Cryptocercus punctulatus and Therea petiveriana : how do they fit into the phylogeny ofcockroaches? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 264:763-768.Genecodes. 1999. Sequencher. Genecodes, Ann Arbor.Giribet, G. et C. Ribera. 2000. A review of arthropod phylogeny: new data based on ribosomal DNAsequences and direct character optimization. Cladistics 16:204-231.Giribet, G. 2001. Exploring the behavior of POY, a program for direct optimization of molecular data.Cladistics 17:S60-S70.Giribet, G. et W. C. Wheeler. 2001. Some unusual small-subunit ribosomal RNA sequences ofmetazoans. American Museum Novitates 3337:1-15.259
Page 1:
UFR des Sciences de la VieEcole Doc
Page 4 and 5:
Je remercie toutes les personnes av
Page 7 and 8:
Ta b l e d e s Mat i è r e sRe m e
Page 9 and 10:
Données moléculaires sans les sé
Page 11:
Ch a p i t r e V : Di s c u s s i o
Page 14 and 15:
Figure 3.10 : Analyse cladistique d
Page 17 and 18:
Li s t e d e s Ta b l e au xTableau
Page 19:
In t r o d u c t i o nNothing in bi
Page 22 and 23:
Ev o l u t i o n d u c o m p o r t
Page 24 and 25:
Page 27 and 28:
I. An a ly s e d u c o n t e x t e
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 61 and 62:
II. Mat é r i e l s e t m é t h o
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65:
ABCDEGHFJIK
Page 68 and 69:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111:
Page 115 and 116:
III. Réversibilité, c o n t r a i
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187:
CHAPITRE IVEv o l u t i o n d e s c
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227: Ev o l u t i o n d u c o m p o r t
Page 259 and 260: V. Dis c u s s ion g é n é r a l
Page 271: V. Dis c u s s ion g é n é r a l
Page 274 and 275: Ré f é r e n c e s b i b l i o g
Page 291 and 292: ANNEXE IDéf i n i t i o n s deq u
Page 293 and 294: ANNEXE IIPr o t o c o l e d’ex t
Page 295 and 296: ANNEXE IIILeg e n d r e et al . (Bi
Page 297 and 298: An n e x e sAbstractA new method is
Page 299 and 300: An n e x e sexpressed in such non-s
Page 301 and 302: An n e x e sanother species would a
Page 303 and 304: An n e x e sMolecular data for all
Page 305 and 306: An n e x e sevolutionary ecological
Page 307 and 308: An n e x e sThe comparison of the t
Page 309 and 310: An n e x e sDefining and including
Page 311 and 312: An n e x e s“avoiding” acts (GD
Page 313 and 314: An n e x e sGautier JY, Deleporte P
Page 315 and 316: An n e x e sMcLennan DA, Brooks DR,
Page 317 and 318: An n e x e sWenzel JW. 1993. Applic
Page 319 and 320: An n e x e sTable 1: PCR primers na
Page 321 and 322: An n e x e sTable 4: Phylogenetic a
Page 323 and 324: An n e x e sPhortioeca nimbataP.n.
Page 325 and 326: An n e x e sSchultesia lampyridifor
Page 327 and 328:
An n e x e sSpecies 1 = outgroupInd
Page 329:
An n e x e sAnalysis AEublaberus di
Page 332 and 333:
Page 334 and 335:
Page 336 and 337:
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342 and 343:
Page 344 and 345:
Page 346 and 347:
Page 348 and 349:
Page 350 and 351:
Page 352 and 353:
Page 354 and 355:
Page 356 and 357:
Page 358 and 359:
Page 360 and 361:
Page 362 and 363:
Page 364 and 365:
Page 366 and 367:
Page 368 and 369:
Page 370 and 371:
Page 372 and 373:
Page 374 and 375:
Page 376 and 377:
Page 378 and 379:
Page 380 and 381:
Page 382 and 383:
igureEv o l u t i o n d u c o m p o
Page 384 and 385:
FigureEv o l u t i o n d u c o m p
Page 386 and 387:
Figure Ev o l u t i o n d u c o m p
Page 388 and 389:
FigureEv o l u t i o n d u c o m p
Page 390 and 391:
Page 392 and 393:
ablesEvo l u t i o n d u c o m p o
Page 395 and 396:
ANNEXE VICom m a n d e s de s an a
Page 397:
An n e x e sCommandes relatives à
Page 400 and 401:
Page 402 and 403:
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
Page 408 and 409:
Page 410 and 411:
Page 412 and 413:
Page 415 and 416:
ANNEXE XIICur r i c u l u m Vi t a
Page 417 and 418:
An n e x e s
Page 419 and 420:
An n e x e s
Page 421 and 422:
Ré s u m éPh y l o g é n i e e t
show all

PhylogÃ©nie Et Evolution Du Comportement Social Chez Les Blattes ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?