PhylogÃ©nie Et Evolution Du Comportement Social Chez Les Blattes ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Ev o l u t i o n d u c o m p o r t e m e n t s o c i a lREFERENCESAbbott A. 1995. Sequence Analysis: New methods for old ideas. Annual Review of Sociology21: 93-113.Abbott A, Tsay A. 2000. Sequence analysis and optimal matching methods in sociology.Review and prospect. Sociological Methods & Research 29: 3-33.Atz JW. 1970. The application of the idea of homology to behavior. In: Aronson LR, TobachE, Lehrman DS, Rosenblatt JS, eds. Development and evolution of behavior. SanFrancisco: W. H. Freeman. 53-74.Baerends GP. 1958. Comparative methods and the concept of homology in the study ofbehavior. Archives Neerlandaises de Zoologie Supplement 13: 401-417.Baerends GP, Baerends JM. 1950. An introduction to the ethology of cichlid fishes.Behavior (Supplement) 1: 1-242.Bakeman R, Quera, V. 1995. Analyzing interaction: Sequential analysis with SDIS andGSEQ. Cambridge University Press, New York.Bininda-Emonds ORP, Jeffery JE, Coates MI, Richardson MK. 2002. From Haeckel toevent-pairing: the evolution of developmental sequences. Theory in Biosciences 121:297-320.Brooks DR, McLennan DA. 2002. The nature of diversity. An evolutionary voyage ofdiscovery. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Cap H, Aulagnier S, Deleporte P. 2002. The phylogeny and behaviour of Cervidae(Ruminantia Pecora). Ethology, Ecology and Evolution 14: 199-216.Chatfield C, Lemon RE. 1970. Analysing sequences of behavioural events. Journal ofTheoretical Biology 29: 427-445.Coddington JA. 1986. Orb webs in non-orb weaving ogre-faced spiders (Araneae:Dinopidae): A question of genealogy. Cladistics 2: 53-67.de Queiroz A, Wimberger PH. 1993. The usefulness of behavior for phylogeny estimation -levels of homoplasy in behavioral and morphological characters. Evolution 47: 46-60.Desutter-Grandcolas L, Robillard T. 2003. Phylogeny and the evolution of calling songs inGryllus (Insecta, Orthoptera, Gryllidae). Zoologica Scripta 32: 173–183.Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and highthroughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32(5): 1792-1797.Elzinga CH. 2003. Sequence Similarity. A Nonaligning Technique. Sociological Methods &Research 32: 3-29.Faith DP, Cranston PS. 1991. Could a cladogram this short have arisen by chance alone? Onpermutation tests for cladistic structure. Cladistics 7: 1-28.Gautier JY. 1974. Processus de différenciation de l’organisation sociale chez quelquesespèces de blattes du genre Blaberus: aspects écologiques et éthologiques. PhD Thesis,Université de Rennes.294
An n e x e sGautier JY, Deleporte P, Rivault C. 1988. Relationships between ecology and socialbehavior in cockroaches. In: Schlobodchikoff CN, ed. The ecology of social behavior.San Diego: Academic Press. 335-351.Genecodes. 1999. Sequencher. Genecodes, Ann. Arbor.Giribet G, Carranza S, Baguñà J, Riutort M, Ribera C. 1996. First molecular evidence forthe existence of a Tardigrada + Arthropoda clade. Molecular Biology and Evolution13: 76-84.Goloboff PA, Mattoni CI, Sebastián Quinteros A. 2006. Continuous characters analysed assuch. Cladistics 22: 589-601.Gottman JM, Roy AK. 1990. Sequential analysis: A guide for behavioral researchers.Cambridge University Press, New York.Grandcolas P. 1991. Les Blattes de la forêt tropical de Guyane Française: Structure dupeuplement et étude éco-éthologique des Zetoborinae. PhD Thesis, Université deRennes.Grandcolas P. 1993a. Monophylie et structure phylogénétique des [Blaberinae + Zetoborinae+ Gyninae + Diplopterinae] (Dictyoptera : Blaberidae). Annales de la Sociétéentomologique de France (N.S.) 29: 195-222.Grandcolas P. 1993b. Habitats of solitary and gregarious species in the neotropicalZetoborinae (Insecta, Blattaria). Studies in Neotropical Fauna and Environment 28:179-190.Grandcolas P. 1998. The evolutionary interplay of social behavior, resource use and antipredatorbehavior in Zetoborinae + Blaberinae + Gyninae + Diplopterinae cockroaches:a phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 14: 117-127.Grandcolas P. 1999. The origin of diversity in cockroaches: a phylogenetic perspective ofsociality, reproduction, communication and ecology. In: Melic A, De Haro JJ, MendezM, Ribera I, eds. Evolucion y Filogenia de Arthropoda. Zaragoza. 397-420.Grandcolas P, D’Haese C. 2003. Testing adaptation with phylogeny: How to account forphylogenetic pattern and selective value together? Zoologica scripta 32: 483-490.Grandcolas P, D’Haese C. 2004. The origin of a ‘true’ worker caste in termites: Mapping thereal world on the phylogenetic tree. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17: 461-463.Greene HW. 1994. Homology and behavioural repertoires. In: Hall BK, ed. Homology: thehierarchical basis of comparative biology. San Diego: Academic Press. 369-391.Hay B, Wets G, Vanhoof K. 2004. Mining Navigation Patterns Using a Sequence AlignmentMethod. Knowledge and Information Systems 6: 150-163.Heinroth O. 1909. Beobachtungen bei der zucht des zigenmelkers (Caprimulgus europaeusL.). Journal of Ornithology 57.Hillis DM. 1991. Discriminating between phylogenetic signal and random noise in DNAsequences. In: Miyamoto MM, Cracraft J, eds. Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences.Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 278-294.295
Page 1:
UFR des Sciences de la VieEcole Doc
Page 4 and 5:
Je remercie toutes les personnes av
Page 7 and 8:
Ta b l e d e s Mat i è r e sRe m e
Page 9 and 10:
Données moléculaires sans les sé
Page 11:
Ch a p i t r e V : Di s c u s s i o
Page 14 and 15:
Figure 3.10 : Analyse cladistique d
Page 17 and 18:
Li s t e d e s Ta b l e au xTableau
Page 19:
In t r o d u c t i o nNothing in bi
Page 22 and 23:
Ev o l u t i o n d u c o m p o r t
Page 24 and 25:
Page 27 and 28:
I. An a ly s e d u c o n t e x t e
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 61 and 62:
II. Mat é r i e l s e t m é t h o
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65:
ABCDEGHFJIK
Page 68 and 69:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111:
Page 115 and 116:
III. Réversibilité, c o n t r a i
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187:
CHAPITRE IVEv o l u t i o n d e s c
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 259 and 260:
V. Dis c u s s ion g é n é r a l
Page 261 and 262: V. Dis c u s s ion g é n é r a l
Page 271: V. Dis c u s s ion g é n é r a l
Page 274 and 275: Ré f é r e n c e s b i b l i o g
Page 276 and 277: Ev o l u t i o n d u c o m p o r t
Page 291 and 292: ANNEXE IDéf i n i t i o n s deq u
Page 293 and 294: ANNEXE IIPr o t o c o l e d’ex t
Page 295 and 296: ANNEXE IIILeg e n d r e et al . (Bi
Page 297 and 298: An n e x e sAbstractA new method is
Page 299 and 300: An n e x e sexpressed in such non-s
Page 301 and 302: An n e x e sanother species would a
Page 303 and 304: An n e x e sMolecular data for all
Page 305 and 306: An n e x e sevolutionary ecological
Page 307 and 308: An n e x e sThe comparison of the t
Page 309 and 310: An n e x e sDefining and including
Page 311: An n e x e s“avoiding” acts (GD
Page 315 and 316: An n e x e sMcLennan DA, Brooks DR,
Page 317 and 318: An n e x e sWenzel JW. 1993. Applic
Page 319 and 320: An n e x e sTable 1: PCR primers na
Page 321 and 322: An n e x e sTable 4: Phylogenetic a
Page 323 and 324: An n e x e sPhortioeca nimbataP.n.
Page 325 and 326: An n e x e sSchultesia lampyridifor
Page 327 and 328: An n e x e sSpecies 1 = outgroupInd
Page 329: An n e x e sAnalysis AEublaberus di
Page 362 and 363:
Page 364 and 365:
Page 366 and 367:
Page 368 and 369:
Page 370 and 371:
Page 372 and 373:
Page 374 and 375:
Page 376 and 377:
Page 378 and 379:
Page 380 and 381:
Page 382 and 383:
igureEv o l u t i o n d u c o m p o
Page 384 and 385:
FigureEv o l u t i o n d u c o m p
Page 386 and 387:
Figure Ev o l u t i o n d u c o m p
Page 388 and 389:
FigureEv o l u t i o n d u c o m p
Page 390 and 391:
Page 392 and 393:
ablesEvo l u t i o n d u c o m p o
Page 395 and 396:
ANNEXE VICom m a n d e s de s an a
Page 397:
An n e x e sCommandes relatives à
Page 400 and 401:
Page 402 and 403:
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
Page 408 and 409:
Page 410 and 411:
Page 412 and 413:
Page 415 and 416:
ANNEXE XIICur r i c u l u m Vi t a
Page 417 and 418:
An n e x e s
Page 419 and 420:
An n e x e s
Page 421 and 422:
Ré s u m éPh y l o g é n i e e t
show all

PhylogÃ©nie Et Evolution Du Comportement Social Chez Les Blattes ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?