12.07.2015 Views

Quels apports hydrologiques pour les modèles hydrauliques? Vers ...

Quels apports hydrologiques pour les modèles hydrauliques? Vers ...

Quels apports hydrologiques pour les modèles hydrauliques? Vers ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EP, Peak Error (%)3530252015(a) Tahlequah, CalibrationOption 1 (Point + Unif)Option 2 (Point Only)EP, Peak Error (%)3530252015(b) Tahlequah, Validation101 2 3 4 5 6101 2 3 4 5 635(c) Siloam Springs, Calibration35(d) Siloam Springs, Validationtel-00392240, version 1 - 5 Jun 2009EP, Peak Error (%)EP, Peak Error (%)302520151050454035301 2 3 4 5 6(e) Kansas, CalibrationEP, Peak Error (%)EP, Peak Error (%)302520151050454035301 2 3 4 5 6(f) Kansas, Validation251 2 3 4 5 6Number of tributaries251 2 3 4 5 6Number of tributariesFig. 7. Mean peak error (E P ) averaged over the two sub-periods in calibration andvalidation mode at the Tahlequah (downstream end of the reach), Siloam Springs(interior of the reach) and Kansas (tributary) stations with an increasing numberof tributaries modelled individually. The mean peak error was calculated on the 15events listed in Table 1. The criteria were not calculated at the Kansas station forthe configuration having only one tributary (see Section 4).39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!