12.07.2015 Views

Quels apports hydrologiques pour les modèles hydrauliques? Vers ...

Quels apports hydrologiques pour les modèles hydrauliques? Vers ...

Quels apports hydrologiques pour les modèles hydrauliques? Vers ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Performance criteria in validation modeNSE E P (%) E T (h)Option 1 Option 2 Option 1 Option 2 Option 1 Option 2tel-00392240, version 1 - 5 Jun 2009Station (Pt+Unif) (Pt) (Pt+Unif) (Pt) (Pt+Unif) (Pt)Tahlequah 0.91 0.89 13.9 15.5 3.3 3.5Siloam Springs 0.89 0.86 24.4 22.7 1.0 1.2Kansas 0.79 0.70 32.6 26.4 2.4 3.9Table 2Comparison of Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), absolute peak error (E P ) and absolutepeak time error (E T ) with two options for lateral inflow injections: option1 makes use of point and uniformly distributed inflows, option 2 uses only pointinflows. Each value is the best criteria among the six configurations of lateral inflowdistribution. The results for all lateral configurations are presented in Figures 6, 7and 8.44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!