12.07.2015 Views

Quels apports hydrologiques pour les modèles hydrauliques? Vers ...

Quels apports hydrologiques pour les modèles hydrauliques? Vers ...

Quels apports hydrologiques pour les modèles hydrauliques? Vers ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

X - 36LERAT ET AL.: VALUE OF UPSTREAM FLOW MEASUREMENTSREff ( UP−Meas / Bench ), verif.0.80.60.40.20.0First sub−periodSecond sub−periodREff = 0.65 x RSREff ( UP−Meas / Bench ), verif.0.80.60.40.20.0REff = 0.60 x RQM−0.20.01 0.1 1(a) Ratio Surf[UP] / Surf[TOTAL] (RS)−0.20.01 0.1 1(b) Ratio between mean flow UP/TOTAL (RQM)tel-00392240, version 1 - 5 Jun 2009REff ( UP−Meas / Bench ), verif.0.80.60.40.20.0REff = 0.57 x RQ99−0.20.01 0.1 1(c) Ratio between 99% quanti<strong>les</strong> of flow UP/TOTAL (RQ99)Figure 5.Relative efficiency REff(UP-Meas/benchmark) in validation mode plotted againstthree catchment descriptors: (a) the surface ratio between the UP and TOTAL catchment (notedRS), (b) the ratio between the mean annual discharge on the UP and TOTAL stations (notedRQM) and (c) the ratio between the 99 th percentile of the UP and TOTAL streamflow timeseries(noted RQ99). The results of the linear regressions between the descriptors and the REffcriterion are indicated in Table 4.D R A F T July 24, 2008, 3:43pm D R A F T

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!