12.07.2015 Views

Quels apports hydrologiques pour les modèles hydrauliques? Vers ...

Quels apports hydrologiques pour les modèles hydrauliques? Vers ...

Quels apports hydrologiques pour les modèles hydrauliques? Vers ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NSE, Validation1.000.800.600.400.20(a) TahlequahOpt. 1, All possible combin. of trib.Opt. 1, Combination 1−2−3Opt. 2, All possible combin. of trib.Opt. 2, Combination 1−2−31 5 10 15 201.00(b) Siloam Springstel-00392240, version 1 - 5 Jun 2009NSE, ValidationNSE, Validation0.800.600.400.201 5 10 15 20(c) Kansas1.000.800.600.400.201 5 10 15 20Configuration rank (ordered by decreasing NSE)Fig. 10. The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiencies (NSE) averaged over the two sub-periods invalidation mode for the Tahlequah, Siloam Springs and Kansas stations with allpossible combinations of three tributaries as point inflows and the two options oflateral inflows injection. Circ<strong>les</strong> (◦) and squares (□) indicate the performance ofoptions 1 and 2, respectively, with tributaries considered by order of catchment area(configuration including the tributaries coded 1, 2 and 3 on Figure 1).42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!