25.06.2015 Views

Literature review for - Flourish Paediatrics

Literature review for - Flourish Paediatrics

Literature review for - Flourish Paediatrics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

descriptive)<br />

RESULTS<br />

Outcome<br />

EXTERNAL<br />

VALIDITY<br />

Generalisability<br />

Applicability<br />

Comments<br />

Conclusion<br />

9 studies rated "good", 10 as "fair" and 4 as "poor". Better studies had higher risk <strong>for</strong> bottle feeding. OR <strong>for</strong> studies ranged<br />

from 0.56 to 5.95. 19 studies had a protective effect <strong>for</strong> breastfeeding, 1 had no effect and 3 showed a negative effect. Most<br />

of the studies were protective. The pooled OR <strong>for</strong> 23 studies was 2.11 (95% CI: 1.66 - 2.68). For higher quality studies only<br />

OR = 2.24 ("good" studies) and 2.32 (studies in last 10 years). 9 studies included data on partial breastfeeding and 7 had<br />

enough data to estimate SIDs risk; 4 showed a dose response <strong>for</strong> increasing use of <strong>for</strong>mula feeding but none had sufficient<br />

power to demonstrate statistically significant difference <strong>for</strong> partial versus no breastfeeding.<br />

Death from SIDS<br />

Yes<br />

Yes<br />

Data includes Australian studies. The meta-analysis suggested breastfeeding conveys a 50% reduced risk of SIDs<br />

Breastfeeding should be strongly encouraged, independent of SIDs and the evidence <strong>for</strong> SIDs protection is imperfect due to<br />

confounding.<br />

138

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!