25.06.2015 Views

Literature review for - Flourish Paediatrics

Literature review for - Flourish Paediatrics

Literature review for - Flourish Paediatrics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The systematic <strong>review</strong> was of very poor quality. The <strong>review</strong> authors used a systematic method to<br />

retrieve studies, but the included studies were not listed, quality was not assessed, eligibility criteria<br />

were not identified, and data abstraction was not discussed. The authors of the <strong>review</strong> concluded that<br />

the evidence relating the age of introduction of solid foods to the development of atopy is lacking,<br />

inconclusive, and inconsistent, but also recommended the exclusion of supplemental foods during the<br />

first 6 months of life due to the risk of the development of allergic symptoms. The systematic <strong>review</strong><br />

did not contribute to the body of evidence statement. One of the randomised controlled trials<br />

measured age of introduction of solid foods, but did not report any results on this. This study also<br />

did not contribute to the body of evidence statement. There<strong>for</strong>e, only one randomised controlled trial<br />

and four cohort studies were used to develop the statement. The other randomised controlled trial<br />

reported no association between either age at introduction of solid foods in general, specific type of<br />

solid food introduced, or diversity of foods and the development of eczema. However, increased risk<br />

was reported with delay of the introduction of meat until after 6 months, but only in subjects with a<br />

family history of allergy. Two cohort studies examined the late introduction of solids in general, and<br />

reported conflicting results. One cohort study (Snijders 2008) reported no association with food<br />

allergies but an increased risk of other allergies with the introduction of solids after age 7 months,<br />

while the other cohort study (Zutavern 2008) reported an increased risk of food allergies, but no<br />

association with other allergies with the introductions of solids at 4-6 months or after 6 months. The<br />

latter cohort study also reported a reduced risk of food allergy with early diversity of foods (both one<br />

to two, and three to eight, food groups be<strong>for</strong>e age 4 months), but reported no association between age<br />

at introduction of solids and allergic sensitisation to cow’s milk, peanut, or hen’s egg. A third cohort<br />

study (Poole 2006) reported that delaying the initial exposure to cereal grains until after age 6<br />

months significantly increased the risk of developing wheat allergy during childhood, suggesting that<br />

early introduction of cereal grains is protective. Age of introduction of rice cereal had no<br />

association. The final cohort study (Kull 2006) reported that children who were introduced to fish<br />

between age 3-8 months had fewer allergies (asthma, eczema, and allergic rhinitis) compared to<br />

children introduced to fish at age 9 months or older, suggesting that early introduction of fish is<br />

protective. There<strong>for</strong>e, although the data appear to suggest that delaying the introduction of solid<br />

foods until after age 6 months may increase the risk of certain allergies, the data are somewhat<br />

conflicting and may only occur in subjects with a family history of allergy, and there are not enough<br />

studies on either solid foods in general or specific types of solid foods to use this to guide practice.<br />

As three of the five studies reported introduction of solids after six months, the timeframe of six<br />

months rather than four months is used in the body of evidence statement.<br />

488

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!