25.06.2015 Views

Literature review for - Flourish Paediatrics

Literature review for - Flourish Paediatrics

Literature review for - Flourish Paediatrics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

shield was 47 g compared to the group with a nipple shield with a transfer of 27 g. Results <strong>for</strong><br />

another study revealed that the ‘‘Mexican hat’’ nipple shield severely impaired milk transfer<br />

with a mean volume of 19.5 g compared to a mean volume of 46.4 g in the group without a<br />

nipple shield. The thin latex shield also reduced milk transfer to a mean of 29.9 g, but it was<br />

not significantly different than milk transfer of 38.4 g in the group not using nipple shield.<br />

This nonrandomized study was limited by its small sample size. The third study found<br />

subjects expressed significantly more breastmilk during pumping sessions with no nipple<br />

shield in place compared to pumping with a nipple shield. (McKechnie and Eglash 2010)<br />

note that lactating women generally do not use a breast pump with a nipple shield in place<br />

there<strong>for</strong>e findings from this study cannot be generalised to all areas of clinical practice.<br />

(McKechnie and Eglash 2010 concluded that larger studies are required to evaluate the effect<br />

of nipple shields on maternal hormonal patterns, infant suckling response as well as longterm<br />

outcomes such as milk supply, infant weight gain, and duration of lactation.<br />

Eight studies were extracted to assess mother’s experiences using a nipple shield. The studies<br />

indicated that mothers had positive experiences using a nipple shield, with the majority of<br />

mothers maintaining breastfeeding after discontinuing nipple shield use. The authors note that<br />

the studies had small sample sizes, limited follow-up time, and poor statistical measures<br />

there<strong>for</strong>e precaution should be taken when interpreting their results.<br />

Nipple shields are commonly used as an intervention <strong>for</strong> flat/ inverted nipples but the<br />

author’s did not find a positive association between nipple shield use in this population and<br />

breastfeeding duration.<br />

In summary the authors remark that attempts to achieve successful breastfeeding should be<br />

made prior to the introduction of a nipple shield. Health professions should follow mothers<br />

using a nipple shield to aid them transition away from nipple shield use, monitor<br />

breastfeeding outcomes and screen <strong>for</strong> problems that may occur with their use such as poor<br />

milk supply(McKechnie and Eglash 2010).<br />

175

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!