25.06.2015 Views

Literature review for - Flourish Paediatrics

Literature review for - Flourish Paediatrics

Literature review for - Flourish Paediatrics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Population/study<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

breastfeeding duration.<br />

10 studies investigated a<br />

dose-response relationship<br />

with BF duration<br />

Systematic literature search<br />

of Cochrane Library (Issue<br />

2, 2001), Medline,<br />

CINAHL, Current<br />

Contents, PsychInfo,<br />

Lactation Resource Centre<br />

(grey literature). J Hum<br />

Lact and Birth hand<br />

searched volumes 1985 to<br />

end 2000.<br />

Systematic literature search<br />

of Medline (1966- July 1997)<br />

Scientific Citations Index<br />

(1985 – July 1997)<br />

Pediatrics, J of Pediatrics,<br />

NEMJ and Lancet (1966 –<br />

July 1997)<br />

Primiparous mothers<br />

South Australia, Australia<br />

Recruited from antenatal<br />

clinic at large, teaching<br />

hospital (sample not<br />

necessarily random)<br />

First contact prior to baby’s<br />

birth, follow-up in hospital<br />

post delivery, 1 week, 6<br />

weeks, 3 months & 6 months<br />

postpartum<br />

Key words smoking AND<br />

breastfeeding or lactation.<br />

Languages included English,<br />

Key words were “smoking”<br />

AND “breastfeeding”<br />

French, Spanish and<br />

Portuguese<br />

Quality P P P P<br />

Results<br />

Intention to breastfeed<br />

5/6 studies reported a<br />

significant negative<br />

association between<br />

maternal smoking and<br />

intention to breastfeed. One<br />

UK prospective cohort<br />

study (ALSPAC) reported a<br />

dose-response relationship<br />

with # of cigarettes,<br />

although no significant<br />

difference between light<br />

smokers and non-smokers<br />

Pooled OR 1.93 (95% CI<br />

1.55-2.40)<br />

For studies with less than<br />

15% loss to follow-up and<br />

adequate adjustment <strong>for</strong><br />

confounders<br />

Adjusted OR of 1.50 (95% CI<br />

1.34-1.68)<br />

Adj HR <strong>for</strong> weaning (95%CI)<br />

1.35 (0.85-2.16)<br />

Estimated HR <strong>for</strong><br />

parsimonious model<br />

predicting duration of BF<br />

Adj HR (95%CI)<br />

1.49 (0.97-2.28)<br />

Glasgow, Scotland<br />

Recruitment from 4<br />

maternity units<br />

Adj OR intention to<br />

breastfeed at maternity<br />

booking:<br />

0.55 (95%CI 0.41-0.75)<br />

302

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!