06.09.2021 Views

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The public sector<br />

in the public sector’s functions. (We will look at this issue more closely in the next<br />

section.)<br />

As we have noted, the vast majority of public sector employees are engaged in<br />

direct service delivery, particularly through the education, health <strong>and</strong> police/justice<br />

sectors. This reflects the public’s continuing expectation that ‘the service state’ will<br />

provide a range of services directly, as one component in a ‘hybrid mixture of part<br />

public, part private activities, delivery chains that do not remain in neat boxes or<br />

organisational settings’. 19<br />

An overview of recent public sector changes<br />

Developments in how the public sector works reflect the way <strong>Australian</strong>s <strong>and</strong><br />

their elected representatives decide the following questions, <strong>and</strong> how those answers<br />

change over time:<br />

• What are most efficient, effective, equitable <strong>and</strong> sustainable ways for governments<br />

to design <strong>and</strong> deliver services <strong>and</strong> programs that respond to the needs<br />

<strong>and</strong> wants of their citizens, businesses <strong>and</strong> communities?<br />

• How should that response involve the private <strong>and</strong> not-for-profit sectors, <strong>and</strong><br />

citizens themselves?<br />

The ‘traditional’ public sector was arguably the dominant model for the public sector<br />

in Australia <strong>and</strong> New Zeal<strong>and</strong> to the end of the 1980s. This model was characterised<br />

by a number of features derived from the Westminster tradition, including:<br />

• a politically neutral public service controlled by <strong>and</strong> accountable to ministers<br />

• government departments that directly provide services, with little outsourcing<br />

<strong>and</strong> competition, integrating policy <strong>and</strong> operational functions, from the design<br />

of policies through to their implementation <strong>and</strong> delivery ‘at street level’<br />

• in order to perform these functions effectively <strong>and</strong> efficiently, departments<br />

organised in st<strong>and</strong>ardised managerial hierarchies in which power <strong>and</strong> authority<br />

are increasingly invested in correspondingly smaller echelons of senior officials<br />

(as distinct, say, from markets <strong>and</strong> networks) 20<br />

• departments largely designed to implement political directions in discrete,<br />

manageable <strong>and</strong> repetitive tasks, conducted according to prescribed rules <strong>and</strong><br />

technical expertise. 21<br />

However, during the 1970s <strong>and</strong> 1980s, governments were increasingly faced with<br />

economic globalisation, demographic pressures, the role of supranational economic<br />

<strong>and</strong> political institutions <strong>and</strong> concerns about the size <strong>and</strong> cost of their public<br />

19 Wanna, Butcher <strong>and</strong> Freyens 2010, 31.<br />

20 Osborne 2010, 8.<br />

21 Stoker 2006, 45.<br />

131

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!