06.09.2021 Views

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Politics</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Policy</strong><br />

caucus. Rudd attempted to centralise <strong>and</strong> control so many decisions that he was<br />

unable to effectively undertake the business of government. Key policy issues were<br />

left to drift <strong>and</strong> his colleagues began seeking the advice <strong>and</strong> help of his deputy, Julia<br />

Gillard. Ultimately, Rudd lost the confidence of his party room <strong>and</strong> was replaced,<br />

partially on the grounds that he was not running an effective Cabinet government.<br />

Rudd failed to use Cabinet as a robust <strong>and</strong> consultative forum.<br />

Executive government <strong>and</strong> accountability<br />

Governance relies on delegation. In a (semi-)parliamentary democracy we can<br />

conceptualise delegation as shown in Figure 1. This is a simple model of delegation;<br />

the delegation of the authority to act passes from one principal (e.g. voters) to their<br />

agent (e.g. parliament). Functioning accountability measures are what distinguishes<br />

democracy from non-democratic forms of governance.<br />

However, as we have already discovered, the actual practice of executive governance<br />

in Australia is more complicated. Agency problems arise across the chain of<br />

delegation. One of these problems may relate to a difference of preferences between<br />

principals <strong>and</strong> their agents; what voters want <strong>and</strong> what parliament legislates may be<br />

very different.<br />

Theotherproblemistheresultofalackofinformationonthepartofthe<br />

principal. This problem of information comes in two forms. The first is adverse<br />

selection, which relates directly to the quality of representation. Voters may not<br />

have access to enough information or the capacity to choose the representatives<br />

that will serve their interests best. Arguably, political parties, which act as interest<br />

aggregators, have helped resolve the issue of adverse selection by organising around<br />

a party label, which gives citizens ideological shortcuts to help them vote.<br />

The second is moral hazard, where the principal lacks the means or information<br />

to keep their agents accountable <strong>and</strong> diligent. Party discipline has significantly<br />

diluted the ability of parliament to keep the executive accountable, particularly<br />

whenanissueisnotcentraltothesurvivalofthegovernment.However,Australia’s<br />

strong Senate, <strong>and</strong> its powerful committee system, does provide a legislative<br />

mechanism for executive accountability. 22<br />

Agency problems also play out at other stages of the chain of delegation. As<br />

we discussed above, the calculations a prime minister must make when selecting<br />

her Cabinet may not reflect her preferences, <strong>and</strong> ministers must work with a civil<br />

service that they are not always able to select.<br />

As we have seen, prime ministers <strong>and</strong> ministers have developed new institutions<br />

– PMC <strong>and</strong> politically appointed staff – to help them to solve delegation problems<br />

between the prime minister <strong>and</strong> ministers, <strong>and</strong> between ministers <strong>and</strong> the bureaucracy.<br />

However, these new institutions have also complicated the chain of delegation<br />

22 Strøm, Muller <strong>and</strong> Bergman 2003.<br />

66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!