06.09.2021 Views

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

Australian Politics and Policy - Senior, 2019a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Politics</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Policy</strong><br />

Constitution is unambiguous in h<strong>and</strong>ing the right to make laws for the territories<br />

to the Commonwealth:<br />

The Parliament may make laws for the government of any territory surrendered<br />

by any State to <strong>and</strong> accepted by the Commonwealth, or of any territory placed<br />

by the Queen under the authority of <strong>and</strong> accepted by the Commonwealth, or<br />

otherwise acquired by the Commonwealth, <strong>and</strong> may allow the representation of<br />

such territory in either House of the Parliament to the extent <strong>and</strong> on the terms<br />

which it thinks fit. 13<br />

Two recent policy disputes – one now resolved, one ongoing – illustrate this limit<br />

to territorial self-government.<br />

Same-sex marriage <strong>and</strong> civil unions<br />

In March 2004, the ACT proposed legislation to enable civil unions for samesex<br />

couples. The legislation, which would permit civil unions to be conducted<br />

by marriage celebrants <strong>and</strong> would give same-sex couples the same legal rights<br />

<strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ing as heterosexual married couples, was vigorously opposed by the<br />

then federal government under Prime Minister John Howard. The attorney-general<br />

wrote to ACT Chief Minister Stanhope saying that, while the Commonwealth<br />

considered the status of same-sex relationships to be within the jurisdiction of the<br />

states <strong>and</strong> territories, it opposed any altering of the ‘status of marriage’. 14 Stanhope<br />

responded by amending his proposed legislation so that civil unions could not<br />

be performed by marriage celebrants, but the federal parliament, fearing that the<br />

ACT’s legislation was a step towards legalising same-sex marriage, promptly<br />

blockeditbyamendingtheMarriage Act 1961 (Cth) so that the definition of<br />

‘marriage’ changed from ‘a union between two consenting adults’ to ‘a union<br />

betweenoneman<strong>and</strong>onewoman’.<br />

In 2013, under Chief Minister Katy Gallagher, the ACT passed the Marriage<br />

Equality Bill 2013 (ACT) in defiance of the Commonwealth. 15 At the time, the chief<br />

minister stated that:<br />

We would prefer to see the federal parliament legislate for a nationally consistent<br />

scheme, but in the absence of this we will act for the people of the ACT. The<br />

Marriage Equality Bill 2013 will enable couples who are not able to marry under<br />

the Commonwealth Marriage Act 1961 toenterintomarriageintheACT.It<br />

will provide for solemnisation, eligibility, dissolution <strong>and</strong> annulment, regulatory<br />

requirements <strong>and</strong> notice of intention in relation to same-sex marriages. 16<br />

13 Constitution of Australia 2010, section 122.<br />

14 Zanghellini 2007.<br />

15 Karvelas 2013.<br />

16 Gallagher, quoted in Karvelas 2013.<br />

208

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!